As a comment to the 47 Senators +2 that sent their ridiculous letter to the leaders of Iran, it may come as a surprise to you that actually, the negotiation of treaties had long since been taken over by the President; the Senate’s role in relation to treaties is today essentially legislative in character.
The "functionalist" tradition of flexibility in construing presidential power, especially in light of practical needs and congressional acquiescence, manifests itself perhaps most dramatically in the domains of war and foreign affairs.
As an adult, I saw racism revealed over and over again. I found a common thread in political views running through every racist that I encountered. All of them held conservative views. None of them held Liberal views on any subject. Conservatism is always a reaction to a challenge to an existing order becoming self-conscious and reflective when other ways of life and thought appear on the scene, against which it is compelled to take up arms in an ideological struggle.
I recently came across a diary titled; "Liberal Racism: 25 Things I Learned After I Wrote About ISIS and White Racism at the Daily Kos"
I wanted to comment on this but unfortunately there was no way to post a comment so, I thought I'd write a diary to address the points. There were quite a few, so I'll try to hit on as many as I can.
These are the words of George Washington:
“Should any American soldier be so base and infamous as to injure any [prisoner]. . . I do most earnestly enjoin you to bring him to such severe and exemplary punishment as the enormity of the crime may require. Should it extend to death itself, it will not be disproportional to its guilt at such a time and in such a cause… for by such conduct they bring shame, disgrace and ruin to themselves and their country.” - George Washington, charge to the Northern Expeditionary Force, Sept. 14, 1775
It’s astonishing to me that this is even a subject for debate in this country. Torture. The very word is vile and is the epitome of everything that stands in complete opposition to American values dating back to Washington and the Revolutionary War. Here is Washington speaking to the troops:
“Should any American soldier be so base and infamous as to injure any [prisoner]. . . I do most earnestly enjoin you to bring him to such severe and exemplary punishment as the enormity of the crime may require. Should it extend to death itself, it will not be disproportional to its guilt at such a time and in such a cause… for by such conduct they bring shame, disgrace and ruin to themselves and their country.” – George Washington, charge to the Northern Expeditionary
Force, Sept. 14, 1775
In her dissent on the contraception ruling, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg notes that “the exercise of religion is characteristic of natural persons, not artificial legal entities.” Ahh...those were the days.
The 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals explained last year that courts have “long recognized the distinction between the owners of a corporation and the corporation itself.” Ruling that “a for-profit corporation can engage in religious exercise” would “eviscerate the fundamental principle that a corporation is a legally distinct entity from its owners.”
Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal on Saturday night accused President Barack Obama and other Democrats of “waging wars against religious liberty and education” and said that a rebellion is brewing in the U.S. with people ready for "a hostile takeover" of the nation's capital.
You have a choice: accept the reality that you are willing to compromise your principles that adhering to traditional values is fundamental to what you believe, which forces you into hypocrisy; or accept that you'd rather be a racist then compromise anything. You can't get around that. It's the problem with any ideology. They're all man-made and flawed. They have a position for everything, except they can never account for every situation.
A true encounter in Bumfuck Pennsylvania.
“Is it possible to decide what marriage law should be without entering into moral and religious controversies about the moral status of homosexuality and the purpose of marriage?”
What is "morality" and where does our sense of it come from?
Recommended by Adagio4639
- According to the nonpartisan Public Religion Research Institute and their American Values Atlas report released last month, there is a significant rise in America of those who say they are ...64 comments 88 Recs
- This past weekend marked the 50th anniversary of one of the most iconic events in America's history. In 1965 hundreds of protesters organized a march from Selma to Montgomery, Alabama to demand an ...28 comments 55 Recs
- As noted in Vyan's diary , Joe Scarborough said, 'Michael Brown is a Thug... who knocked over a Liquor Store.' Joe Scarborough could just as easily and far more accurately have said, 'Michael Brown ...19 comments 25 Recs
- Apparently Black people just don't know what's good for them. They don't know how to pick their own heroes according to Joe Scarborough, because he says that "Michael Brown is a Thug... who knocked ...182 comments 220 Recs
- On the evening of July 2, 1964, President Lyndon Johnson lay down beneath the grand canopy of his four post bed in The White House's 2nd floor living room, exhausted; his mind surely swirling with ...134 comments 103 Recs
- Fear is what is driving these healthcare debates, and it is not a fear of Government Controlled Health Care. It is a fear of the changing social structure.31 comments 19 Recs
- No current results.
- No current results.