Skip to main content

Reposted from Cindy Casella by Clytemnestra

The NYU Student Tweeting Every Reported US Drone Strike Has Revealed A Disturbing Trend

NYU student Josh Begley is tweeting every reported U.S. drone strike since 2002, and the feed highlights a disturbing tactic employed by the U.S. that is widely considered a war crime.

Known as the "double tap," the tactic involves bombing a target multiple times in relatively quick succession, meaning that the second strike often hits first responders.

A strike against rescuers, a notorious terrorist tactic, is horrifically exposed in "Collateral Murder," a war crime video that Private Bradley Manning allegedly sent to Wikileaks, for which he was arrested and tortured in prison.

Glenn Greenwald wrote a Salon article, U.S. again bombs mourners:  The Obama policy of attacking rescuers and grieving rituals continues this weekend in Pakistan in June of this year.  

The MSM hardly covers drone war crimes, a subject that is equally below the radar on DailyKos and other progressive websites.  

Dick Polman wrote this thought provoking op-ed, The silence from liberals on the drone war.

I’m amazed that so few Americans — most notably, so few liberals — have protested his secretive remote-control assassination program. Drones have killed 3,000 people in Yemen and Pakistan, including collateral-damage civilians, but the actual numbers are secret. So is the process. We don’t know anything about the rules of engagement, how people wind up on Obama’s hit list, who reviews the evidence, and what criteria are applied to that evidence.

The Fifth Amendment to the Constitution states that “No person shall be . . . deprived of life . . . without due process of law.” Drones are inimical to due process. It would be nice to know how the administration’s lawyers have addressed that conundrum in legal memos. Those memos exist, but they remain classified. The Obama team is reportedly writing rules for itself, a set of standards and procedures, but we may never know whether these rules are scrupulously followed, or even what they are.

Back in May 2009, Obama vowed that his national security actions would be transparent, so that Americans could “make informed judgments and hold us accountable.” But nearly four years and hundreds of drone strikes later, his actions bring to mind the remark Michael Corleone utters near the end of The Godfather Part II: “If anything in this life is certain, if history has taught us anything, it’s that you can kill anybody.”

Where is the sympathy for victims of drones in Pakistan?   Where is the outrage about the slaughter of innocent civilians by drones?  Where are the makeshift teddy bear memorials and flowers for the 168 children killed in drone strikes in Pakistan since start of campaign?

George Monbiot writes about this hypocisy in the Guardian, In the US, mass child killings are tragedies. In Pakistan, mere bug splats: Barack Obama's tears for the children of Newtown are in stark contrast to his silence over the children murdered by his drones

"Mere words cannot match the depths of your sorrow, nor can they heal your wounded hearts … These tragedies must end. And to end them, we must change." Every parent can connect with what President Barack Obama said about the murder of 20 children in Newtown, Connecticut. There can scarcely be a person on earth with access to the media who is untouched by the grief of the people of that town.

It must follow that what applies to the children murdered there by a deranged young man also applies to the children murdered in Pakistan by a sombre American president. These children are just as important, just as real, just as deserving of the world's concern. Yet there are no presidential speeches or presidential tears for them, no pictures on the front pages of the world's newspapers, no interviews with grieving relatives, no minute analysis of what happened and why.

If the victims of Mr Obama's drone strikes are mentioned by the state at all, they are discussed in terms which suggest that they are less than human. The people who operate the drones, Rolling Stone magazine reports, describe their casualties as "bug splats", "since viewing the body through a grainy-green video image gives the sense of an insect being crushed". Or they are reduced to vegetation: justifying the drone war, Obama's counterterrorism adviser Bruce Riedel explained that "you've got to mow the lawn all the time. The minute you stop mowing, the grass is going to grow back".

The children killed by drones in Pakistan are not "bug splats," and they and all the innocent people killed by drone strikes, their friends, and families deserve just as much sympathy as the loved ones mourning the loss of American elementary school children recently killed by an assault weapon here at home.

The Pakistani children share something else in common with the Connecticut children other than the "Made in America" violence that took their lives: the role played by political action committees (PACs) in their tragic deaths.  The NRA and the military industrial complex control the majority of our Congressmen, which is why they avoid doing anything about gun control and the illegal drone war.

We, the people, need to take back our country to protect innocent lives from heartless corporations who sell and manufacture weapons of mass murder that kill innocent children here and abroad.

Reposted from Clytemnestra by Clytemnestra

This morning Dave Brubeck, a jazz pioneer died at 91.  He would have turned 92 on Thursday.

Brubeck died Wednesday morning of heart failure after being stricken while on his way to a cardiology appointment with his son Darius, said his manager Russell Gloyd. Brubeck would have turned 92 on Thursday.
-- Salon
One of his most famous works, "Take Five"

Just how universal and influential was Dave Brubeck?  Here is "Take Five" from Sachal Studios in Lahore, Pakistan (2011) played by musicians of the once mighty "Lollywood."  

Dave Brubeck liked this version very much.

Thank you Dave.

Continue Reading

Sun Oct 14, 2012 at 02:01 PM PDT

Pakistan Is Uniting Behind Malala

by zenbassoon

Reposted from zenbassoon by Clytemnestra
Pakistani students hold pictures of 14-year-old schoolgirl Malala Yousufzai, who was shot last Tuesday by the Taliban for speaking out in support of education for women, during a protest condemning the attack, in Karachi, Pakistan, Saturday, Oct. 13, 2012. (AP Photo/Fareed Khan)
Things are changing.  The voice of one girl has become the voice of all girls.
Pakistani children sit around a picture of 14-year-old schoolgirl Malala Yousufzai, who was shot last Tuesday by the Taliban for speaking out in support of education for women, as they pray for her recovery during a candlelight vigil in Hyderabad, Pakistan, Saturday, Oct. 13, 2012. (AP Photo/Pervez Masih)
Pakistani children sit around a picture of 14-year-old schoolgirl Malala Yousufzai, who was shot last Tuesday by the Taliban for speaking out in support of education for women, as they pray for her recovery during a candlelight vigil in Hyderabad, Pakistan, Saturday, Oct. 13, 2012. (AP Photo/Pervez Masih)
Read about the wave below the Kos-a-doodle
Continue Reading
Reposted from InfiniteThoughts by Clytemnestra

I just tuned into MSNBC after a long day. I was thrilled that he has spent the last 10 minutes and maybe a few more on the shameful shooting of Malala Yousufzai.

Continue Reading
Reposted from Bill Prendergast by Clytemnestra

This hasn't gotten any press follow-up. This week Bachmann proposed expanding the Afghanistan war into Pakistan:

Bachmann expressed chagrin over the administration’s perceived unwillingness to attack fertilizer plants in Pakistan, arguably an American ally, from which insurgents are obtaining materials for bombs.
Many other bizarre statements by Bachmann during a talk with Minnesota press:
“I believe we’ve made some very serous mistakes in Afghanistan,” Bachmann said, saying America had been victorious in Afghanistan at one point.
Continue Reading

Fri Jun 24, 2011 at 06:57 AM PDT

S.O.S. Pakistan

by MoCoDem99

Reposted from MoCoDem99 by Clytemnestra

Over the years, a large community of Pakistani-Americans has enjoyed success and upward mobility living here in America. As a community we are well-assimilated, mostly educated and enjoying a fair degree of financial success. We are comfortable in our American identities, but like earlier waves of immigrants we have a strong bond of affection for and like to keep tabs on the “Old Country”.

The news from Pakistan, however, is not good. As much as we would like to hear about progress and prosperity, we have instead become accustomed to reports that leave us shaking our heads in dismay and disbelief. Suicide bombings, assassinations and kidnappings-for-ransom are de rigueur. The economy remains weak. And the country seems often to be lurching from one existential crisis to the next. While other similar large developing countries are rapidly moving into the age of modernity, Pakistan seems stuck in place or even moving backwards. 50 years ago, Pakistan was at least socially and economically on-par with the likes of India, Turkey and Indonesia. Today Pakistan is embarrassingly receding further and further into their rear-view mirrors.

In most peoples’ minds today, Pakistan is associated with terrorism, violence and religious extremism. Terrorist bombs and ignoramus religious fanatics have wrought enormous physical damage on Pakistanis’ property, infrastructure and lives. But on a deeper level they have damaged the country in more profound ways: They have succeeded in fundamentally changing the Pakistani psyche and the very cultural fabric. Mountains of anecdotal evidence indicate that Pakistanis have become more religiously intolerant, more illiberal and more prone to wild conspiracy theories in the past decade. And these changes are ruining the country.

How is it even fathomable that in the 21st century a village “council of elders” would officially sentence a 30-year-old woman to be gang raped as honor-revenge for the alleged misbehavior of her teenage brother? Or that a large swathe of society believes that both 9/11 and the Bin Laden’s killing were both faked? In which other country will 70,000 people participate in a demonstration because of an offensive cartoon run in some obscure Danish newspaper? What are we to make of a society that gives widespread approval to a law that exposes its Christian and Ahmeddiya minorities to the death penalty for simply criticizing Islam? And what does it tell us when the assassin who killed the governor leading the charge against that law is feted with rose petals by jubilant mobs?

Continue Reading
You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.


Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site