One of the major arguments in this presidential campaign concerns who is more ready to be Commander In Chief. Hillary Clinton stakes her claim to unique readiness based on her 35 years of political experience. Here I would draw attention to an interesting analysis of Clinton's 35-year claim which can be found at politifact.com, in "Adding up Clinton's 35-year Claim" by Bill Adair.
Whether one accepts her claim as completely valid or not, Barack Obama responds in part by calling attention to Clinton's judgment, notably on the subject of the disastrous war in Iraq, pointing out that she voted for the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002, which he opposed. Obama asserts that he has the superior judgment required by the job.
What constitutes readiness, if one can indeed be truly ready for the awesome responsibilities of Commander In Chief? Does experience trump judgment, which is rooted in character? What does it take to succeed?
Read More