Like just about every other issue nowadays, the Loughner shooting has reached a point where the media has set up two "sides" for everyone. One side has been calling out the various insanity coming out of the tea party, which casts Democrats as literal enemies to be targeted and destroyed, by voting or second amendment remedies. The other side has mounted a defense of this rhetoric, blaming everything from pot to heavy metal to anarchism to (despicably) progressives themselves.
In my, admittedly very amateur, opinion, Jared Lee Loughner was probably mentally ill, and the idea he had a coherent motive for his actions is a bit implausible. Nor does it even seem he was connected to the tea party "movement" at all. So let's not start making motives that aren't there.
But the fact Jared Loughner wasn't directly influenced by Sarah Palin's target poster or Glenn Beck's conspiracy-board or whatever-else doesn't mean this stuff isn't irresponsible, isn't dangerous, and hasn't already caused real human violence.
If I seem a bit rambling, it's because both the tragic Giffords story and the reporting of the story itself have given me a lot of thoughts, and they don't quite seem to add up to any "side" in the debate.
Read More