I watched the RNC during most of the speeches, and despite my dizziness from all the derisive sarcasm, condescension, and bullying, it spurred thought about smart satire vs cruel derision. Now, I'm not sure there is a difference, unless we simply decide via subjective testing. So my Rorschach was peaked by Romney's presentation. Romney never disappoints if you want ridiculous, fact-free statements. You know stuff like, 'letting the Democrats win means surrendering to terrorists', and that sort of stupid.
But maybe there's a good side to ridiculous statements. I started thinking about how inspiring some of the players are to comics. As in inspiring to Stephen Colbert, one of my favorite geniuses. Could Mitt Romney be one of the characters Stephen found compelling, while designing his talented talk show host personality on 'The Colbert Report'?
If so, thank you, Mitt! Because you wield a lot of power and persuade a lot of people, it's pretty scary to some of us who read. What can we do to get point of fact across to the general public?
Read More