[Cross-posted at Los Punditos]
Jonathan Rauch, of the Brookings Institution, has a piece in yesterday's The New Republic Online, arguing that the legalization of same-sex marriage will be good not only for the children of homosexual parents, but the children of heterosexual ones as well. This is a perfectly reasonable argument, and one he makes quite well. Of course the piece, and Mr. Rauch's new book on the subject, will be met with derision and howls of inquietude by the conservative culture warriors for legitimizing the idea that - gosh! - homosexual couples can be good parents too and, more importantly, that man-woman unions do not necessarily need any more enshrining, at least, not under the law.
When confronted with gay marriage as a civil rights argument, or as a matter of civil acknowledgment of a religious institution, the culture warriors invariably fall back on "But... but.. think of the children!" Children, they say, are shown to benefit more from having a mommy and a daddy. This is a gross misreading of what the consensus actually is among educators, psychologists, and social scientists.
Read More