(Note - the split infinitive in the title is not a mistake - it is poetic license taken and used for emphasis)...
Although I frequently comment at DK, I only rarely issue diaries (I believe this is only my third in a dozen years of DK). I'm even less of a blogger (zero times, if you don't consider diarists real bloggers). But in the absence of both (IMHO) a necessary and sufficient discussion/debate on the suitability of Hillary Rodham Clinton as the 2016 Democratic candidate for President, I believe it's time to step up and begin asking all the impolite questions - and one hopes - stimulate something, because once she's formally declared, it will become increasingly difficult to air legitimate criticisms without seeming like an unwitting auxiliary to the right-wing noise machine. No, let's discuss it soon, this summer, and before folks get too distracted by the mid-term elections. Her book (which I haven't read, nor do I plan to read) is out now and we're told that it's the closest thing we have to a hint of a declaration to run for President. Let's please engender a lively discussion - all comers welcome - pros and cons - HRC lovers and haters and all that there is in-between. Below the orange croissant is a list of my concerns (which will telegraph more or less where I stand (perhaps a bit snarkastic), although where I stand is unimportant). What is important is that your voices are spoken and heard. Let's please keep it civil (i.e., attack the idea, not the person).
Read More