Skip to main content


The leadership in the House and Senate are playing a dangerous game of chicken that just might result in the crashing and burning of Democratic majorities in both houses.  Chickenshit blue dogs are preventing either from blinking first on the tax debate, as Rachel Maddow and Lawrence O'Donnell explained last night.  Clip and more "after the fold," as the kids say.

Continue Reading

Fri Oct 17, 2008 at 01:41 PM PDT

On One-Issue Voters

by Simply Agrestic

Quick introduction [proofreading note: okay, yes, three paragraphs is not "quick," sorry :-] -- my wife and I will be celebrating our fourth wedding anniversary on Monday.  Forgoing a large wedding ceremony (which we hope to be able to afford next year), we were married at the Justice of the Peace with my wife's Republican sister and gay best friend as witnesses.  We then went our separate ways for the day -- I had to work and she had nursing classes to attend.  We both noted that nothing seemed to change in how much we loved each other.  We were attending the church she grew up in at the time and to their eyes we were living "in sin" by living together before that day, and somehow God viewed us differently due to a piece of paper?  My love for my wife grows every day, but its rate of growth did not increase that day solely because she took my last name.

Continue Reading

Barack Obama is playing a game of chess while John McCain is playing checkers.  I'm not the first one to use that metaphor.  The Obama campaign has been constantly several steps ahead of the Republicans throughout this election season.  Is it possible that the "Lipstick on a Pig" controversy is another example of this?  It would appear that the McCain campaign is taking some serious lumps for this "manufactured outrage."  Once again, their lack of policy depth and substance is displayed for all of America -- they'd rather talk about nonsense they discuss the real issues.  Even Chris Matthews and Bill ORLY, bastions of feminism that they are, came to Obama's defense and patently dismissed claims that Obama's was referring to Gov. Palin.  Should the Obama campaign really be surprised when they come out looking like the mature ones?

Continue Reading

Last night my wife inspired me (this is not an uncommon occurrence).  On her way home from work, she heard the cheesy Darryl Worley song, "Have You Forgotten?" on the radio.  She's a country music fan and was initially moved quite a bit to that genre's response to 9/11.  But the world has changed in the last seven years; she and other disaffected Bush supporters are not as easily swayed by propaganda as they were back when Bush's approval ratings were in the positive digits upwards of 80-90% in the days after than horrible tragedy.

Continue Reading

Days before John Edwards suspended his campaign, I donated $50.  It took a couple weeks, but I got over the fact that I "donated to a loser," as a colleague told me.  It was only money; besides, I supported his policies and I supported him personally as a representative of those who aren't always fortunate enough to have their voices heard.

Continue Reading

See article here regarding the fundraising "edge" that the RNC/McSame have over the DNC/Obama.  A few things in there confused me, I was hoping fellow Kossacks could help.  Most of my befuddlement comes from the whole "primary election" funds vs. "general election" funds distinction, though media bias in general also had me scratching my head.

Continue Reading

CNN reports that three more superdelegates have endorsed Sen. Obama today -- Reps. David Price (NC-4) and Mel Watt (NC-12) of North Carolina and newly-elected André Carson (IN-4) of Indiana.

Continue Reading

I may be a political junkie, but I have other interests as well.  I'm a huge hockey fan, and even though I live in the Detroit metro area, my favorite team is the Dallas Stars.  I grew up in Kalamazoo, and for thirteen years, we were the home of the primary minor-league affiliate for the Minnesota / Dallas franchise.  I also think it's fun to make fun of Red Wings fans. :)  I never figured these two main interests of mine would ever converge.

Poll

How should I respond to the next Rethug attack?

6%1 votes
18%3 votes
43%7 votes
6%1 votes
6%1 votes
18%3 votes

| 16 votes | Vote | Results

Continue Reading

I can't vote for a Repub.  I'm sorry, Kos, I just can't do it.  I understand the logic; yes, it would help us out if the GOP race lingered on and stayed a 3-man race.  Winning MI would certainly help Romney's campaign.  But he doesn't need our help and dismissing tomorrow's Michigan Democratic primary as a "straw poll" is bad strategy for Democrats.

Continue Reading

Fri Nov 30, 2007 at 05:53 AM PST

Vote "Uncommitted" in Michigan

by Simply Agrestic

Update: Oops, looks like I type too slow - none other than the Bob Alexander mentioned in the story scooped me.

Update #2: Forgot to mention, CNN had this AP article as front-page news on the politics section of their website.  MSNBC now does as well.  I'm no fan of the MSM, but this would indicate to me a pattern; perhaps we'll see some coverage by the talking heads later today?

There may be a possible chink in Hillary Clinton's expected landslide victory in Michigan's otherwise irrelevant Jan. 15th primary.  Although she's the only candidate currently polling nationally in double-digits who will actually be listed on the ballot, Obama and Edwards (and Richardson and Biden) supporters now appear to have another option.  As a CNN/AP story reports ("Clinton faces unusual opponent in Michigan"), Michigan votes will have the option to vote for "Uncommitted."  If enough people vote this way, these "Uncommitted" delegates could later go to another candidate.  Even possibly Al Gore, Democratic activist Bob Alexander hopes.

Poll

What will be the main effect will the "Uncommitted" strategy?

26%12 votes
4%2 votes
13%6 votes
11%5 votes
26%12 votes
17%8 votes

| 45 votes | Vote | Results

Continue Reading

The Democratic National Committee's decision to bar Florida's delegates (and possibly Michigan's) from participating in next August's convention needs to be reversed.  Immediately.  Not only does it effectively disenfranchise primary voters from these two very important swing states, it allows the GOP to gain exposure in otherwise blue-leaning states.

While the leading (and some 2nd-tier) Democratic candidates have signed a "Four State Pledge," caving in to IA, NH, NV, and SC (great diary, BTW, okamichan13), the GOP has planned a primary right here in Dearborn on October 9th, according to WDIV's "Click on Detroit" website.

Continue Reading

Let me preface this diary (my first one, I might add :) by stating that I will vote for the Democratic nominee next November, no matter what.  This diary should not be read as just another anti-Hillary diary, as I personally have nothing against Senator Clinton, nor do I think she would make a "weak" candidate, as many pundits on both sides of the aisle have stated repeatedly (though I have to admit, I do think she'd hurt us downticket).  I simply do not want to see the level of corruption, cronyism, and deception that is present in the Republican Party seep into our party.

It has been nearly 32 years since a Republican-controlled Executive Branch has not contained a fellow named Bush as either the first- or second-in-command.  We have to go all the way back to the Ford/Rockefeller administration--even then, a Bush influence still appears.  While looking up the name of Ford's VP on Wikipedia (forgive me, I'm only 24), I learned that when Ford nominated Rockefeller as VP, "Rockefeller's top competitor [for the nomination] had been George H.W. Bush."

Continue Reading
You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.

RSS

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site