Skip to main content

View Diary: Andrea Mitchell flunks American democracy in debt debate (177 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Yep, it's too PC if it relates to sexism. Right. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    "If you trust you are not critical; if you are critical you do not trust" by our own Dauphin

    by gustynpip on Fri Jul 29, 2011 at 11:56:53 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  "relates to sexism" is a pretty broad brush (3+ / 0-)

      and you could smear pretty much anyone with it.  How about we consider context and intent before quashing speech as unPC?  Or would that hurt too many feelings?  BTW, it insults me as a woman to imply that I can't tell the fucking difference between sarcastic political speech and a sexist remark.  So check your own sexism.

      Marquess of Queensberry much?  This is politics.  She's joined at the hip to her plutocratic evil twin and enables him with every poisoned mote she spews in the guise of a responsible journalist.  And the more people are made aware of it by whatever means, the better.

      Which side are you on?

      by wiseacre on Fri Jul 29, 2011 at 12:07:41 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Well said (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:

        Would rec again if I could. Credit this woman (me) with having enough intelligence to know the difference please. If she wants to waste energy on this mock anger and overt PC-ism, it is her call.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site