Skip to main content

View Diary: Town meeting attendees to McCollum: tax the rich, end the wars, protect social programs (49 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  No doubt, "the majority of Americans" supported (0+ / 0-)

    slavery at one time.

    Should Lincoln have continued to "embrace" that policy?

    •  Why of course! Because slavery (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      and supporting Wall Street are exactly the same issues!


      If you're going to build a straw man, at least put some effort into it.  

      As a hardcore Democrat, Obama has shaken my faith. Imagine what he's done for independents.

      by Johnathan Ivan on Wed Aug 10, 2011 at 08:17:49 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Actually, that's probably not true (0+ / 0-)

      There were no opinion polls to speak of until later in the 19th century, but from what we can tell the majority of Americans opposed slavery already well before the time Lincoln was elected.

      The majority supported various compromising, gradualist positions on getting rid of it, but Lincoln had the sense to notice that the slavers were unwilling to compromise.  You know, after they seceded and fired on Fort Sumter.

      Anyway, your analogy makes no sense.  The right policies are also the popular policies when it comes to economics today.  When the moral thing is the competent thing and is the popular thing, it is deranged for a President to fight AGAINST it.

      Read pp. 1-7 of Krugman's _The Great Unraveling_ (available from Google Books). NOW.

      by neroden on Wed Aug 10, 2011 at 09:47:14 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site