Skip to main content

View Diary: The 'Greenies' are back in full force (342 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  yes (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Johnny Q

    I am referring to the pre-clinton party.

    although it has accelerated in recent years. at least clinton raised taxes, for instance.

    •  which one? where is the platform link? (0+ / 0-)

      and where is the supposed legislation list.

      bring it on.  fdr?  catered to racists and fought the uber lefties in his party. lbj?  

      •  for example, from your first link: (0+ / 0-)
        "
        The national-origins quota system of limiting immigration contradicts the rounding principles of this nation. It is inconsistent with our belief in the rights of man. This system was instituted after World War I as a policy of deliberate discrimination by a Republican Administration and Congress
        ."

        Read more at the American Presidency Project: www.presidency.ucsb.edu http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/...

        meanwhile this president has accelerated
        deportation.

        we could get into his attempts at cutting the safety net. we could get at his support for torture. we could go on and on.

        this stuff has been well-documented, and there's been a ton of diaries about it. if you still refuse to believe it at this point, you are going to change your mind just because of evidence, so I think we are done here.

    •  The Dems are a big tent party. period (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      beach babe in fl, Sylv

      it has been one of our strengths throughout the years.  green party candidates have been funded by republicans to help split our vote.  they have used all kinds of means to peel away support.  but overall the party platform is the same in general.  they are a proAmerica, proEmpire, proBusiness, proRights party. legislation passed has always been a compromise and the progressives have always been pissed at the general party.

      •  yes (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Johnny Q

        but why does "big tent" justify enacting republican policies?

        why does "big tent" meant that the left side of the big tent should shut up and let the right side of the big tend get everything?

        •  because republicans refuse cloture (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          Whimsical

          requiring 60 votes.  in unprecedented numbers.

          •  bullshit (1+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            Rick Aucoin

            the GOP just got "98%" of what they wanted, with 47 senators, not 60+.

            that excuse doesn't work anymore. it has been proven that you don't need 60+ senators to get something done.

            •  seriously? you don't know what it takes (1+ / 0-)
              Recommended by:
              Sylv

              to get a bill passed?

              look up cloture

              •  wow, (0+ / 0-)

                went right over your head.

                again, the republicans are getting what they want with only 47 votes.

                do you understand what that means? that means that stuff can get passed without starting at an automatic 60+ votes if you play hardball and force people to vote on stuff they wouldn't otherwise want to vote.

                these dems keep declaring that if something doesn't have 60 votes BEFORE fighting hard for it, then it can't pass. we now know that's not the case, because the republicans keep getting stuff passed without having 60+ solid republicans int eh senate.

                •  did you look up cloture? (1+ / 0-)
                  Recommended by:
                  Sylv

                  republicans are forcing us to have 60 to even bring a bill to a vote in the senate.

                  you have shown that you don't know much about this.

                  the history, the process...

                  •  i know what cloture is (0+ / 0-)

                    you fucking asshole. stop with the straw-man condescending bullshit. you are purposely ignoring my point and trying to attack me personally.

                    the point is that you can get cloture if you fucking fight hard. the republican have proved this. they did ti with far fewer members in the senate than we had.

                    I'm done discussing this with you. you are not arguing in good faith at this point.

                    •  so why aren't our bills getting voted up or down (0+ / 0-)

                      asshole?

                      •  last comment then I'm done (0+ / 0-)

                        the answer is that it's because we are not forcing them to.

                        we are not holding what the republicans hold dear to them hostage to force them to do it. we are not getting on eh same page,s tarting with the president, hitting them hard for it every day, forcing them to do it.

                        the few times when we did, we got them to back down (see 5 straight time when the GOP had to back down on holding up UI extensions over the first 2 years of obama's term).

                        yell, we are not even forcing them to actually vote on cloture votes, to get them on record. reid would back down on the mere THREAT of not voting for cloture.

                        you may say it doesn't matter, that fighting hard wouldn't have mattered. you don't fucking know that because you can;t fucking know that. we need to fucking try, and try hard.

                        but fucking assholes like you will just continually make excusing wile millions freeze, because "our side" is more important to you. you are scum, you have shown that you are not interested in real discussion (saying that to fight hard mean to abuse the CIA, etc).

                        we are done here.

                    •  by your comments upthread (1+ / 0-)
                      Recommended by:
                      Whimsical

                      you didn't have a clue was cloture was...

                      again, the republicans are getting what they want with only 47 votes.

                      which means you didn't understand cloture.

                      •  again (0+ / 0-)

                        you missed it. i never said closure didn't take 60 votes. i was saying that you don't need to start off with an automatic 60 votes to get cloture, and I used the republicans only have 47 members of the senate as proof of that.

                        you are intentionally missing my point to try to attack me personally.

                        •  um the republicans can do that (0+ / 0-)

                          we did it during the bush years.

                          we never had enough ppl to change the rules. so what else you got?  the rules the rules.

                        •  seems you still don't understand cloture (1+ / 0-)
                          Recommended by:
                          beach babe in fl
                          you don't need to start off with an automatic 60 votes to get cloture, and I used the republicans only have 47 members of the senate as proof of that.

                          if republicans force cloture, then 60 votes are required. now if the rules were changed regarding that, republicans would probably go back to filibustering. in the end, the strategy is the same, prevent us from passing legislation.  we must involve them to get anything passed. which means they have to be bought off...

                          this is how it works folks.  btw, we have that same power and we have used it.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site