Skip to main content

View Diary: Lincoln: The trajectory of a politician (173 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Appreciate the links (9+ / 0-)

    But especially appreciate the sharing of views.

    •  One clarification would be valuable. (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Bobeau, MKinTN
      Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846. From that position, he was deeply critical of the Mexican War and a perpetual supporter of the Wilmot Proviso, which called for the prohibition of slavery from any territory acquired as a result of the Mexican War.

      The main economic point of the Mexican War was to overthrow Mexico's prohibition against slavery. The Mexican government was more than happy to have immigrants come in and do ranching and farming,

      What the Texans wanted was to use East Texas for cotton. This Free Market enterprise of the day ultimately depended on buying male slaves from the older slave states such as South Carolina, Virginia, and Georgia and transporting them west and then quite literally working them to death.

      Cotton exports amounted to 70% to 80% of all American foreign exchange earning from 1850 to 1861. Money swears.

      Angry White Males + Crooks + Personality Disorder psychos + KKKwannabes + "Unborn Child" church folk =EQ= The Republicans

      by vets74 on Mon Aug 22, 2011 at 04:50:33 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  and because of cotton slavery was strengthening (3+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        vets74, andgarden, soothsayer99

        It was not dying out. cotton changed the equation - slaves were becoming more valuable.

        At the time of the country's founding, slavery may have been becoming uneconomical, but that was no longer true after the cotton gin was invented.

        We have to be careful, this is not a small point. New South political spin argued that the Civil War was not really about slavery, since it would have died out. The Civil War was about stopping the growth and spread of slavery, not just in the US but further south as well.

        •  Mexico eradicated slavery despite the cotton gin. (0+ / 0-)

          Meanwhile I'm sure our John Birch "Tea Party" Society righties would reestablish slavery and expand it to whites, today, if they could.

          White trash always think they're going to be the slavers.

          Angry White Males + Crooks + Personality Disorder psychos + KKKwannabes + "Unborn Child" church folk =EQ= The Republicans

          by vets74 on Mon Aug 22, 2011 at 05:56:27 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

      •  More to the point, if slavery couldn't expand, as (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:

        Clay rightly pointed out, it would die.

        Most of the "Old Confederacy" made money, not by exporting cotton, but by exporting slaves to the "New Confederacy."

        Preventing them from finding markets for their slaves (e.g. new slave states) would have killed their profits in two ways: 1) they weren't making all that much money from cotton (cotton depletes the soil fast, as does tobacco), and 2) their electoral power would be greatly diminished within the Senate (and Congress with the 3/5 rule) if there weren't more slave states as more free states came into the Union.

        Clay managed to postpone the war from ~1824 to 1860.  He •tried• in 1850 to postpone it again, but that was not to be.  What would have been a minor regional conflict in ~1824 and the splitting off of a soon-to-be non-viable country turned into the deaths of 600,000 Americans.

        The Great Compromiser.

        Happy little moron, Lucky little man.
        I wish I was a moron, MY GOD, Perhaps I am!
        -Spike Milligan

        by polecat on Mon Aug 22, 2011 at 06:44:10 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site