Skip to main content

View Diary: Obama will issue Super Congress veto threat: No deal without new revenues (311 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  If that happens, I will be happy (0+ / 0-)

    Obama just wants everyone to work together SO bad, he takes bad deals.  I would rather take no deal than a bad deal.  That is where President Obama and I differ.

    Tact is just not saying true stuff. I'll pass.

    by Liberal Elite on Mon Sep 19, 2011 at 09:10:31 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  I don't think any of us is qualified to determine (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      etherealfire

      what "Obama just wants."  He has taken bad deals in the past, but his reasons may range from believing he needs to get something rather than nothing, to having the wrong advisors, to thinking the deals aren't as bad as they look, etc.  Best to skip declaring what he wants to working to support what he's asked for in this case.

      Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it. --Mark Twain

      by SottoVoce on Mon Sep 19, 2011 at 09:25:48 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  He didn't have to sign anything (0+ / 0-)

        There has been no vetos and congressional overrides.  Everything with his name is a law because he wanted it to be. Like Harry said, The Buck stops with him!

        Tact is just not saying true stuff. I'll pass.

        by Liberal Elite on Mon Sep 19, 2011 at 09:34:10 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site