Skip to main content

View Diary: Charles Koch: Social Security for me, but not for thee (62 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  You STILL seem to be denying that Hayek (0+ / 0-)

    made a decision (to partake of a secure and whole Social Security system) that he would deny me and other Americans.

    "Push the button, Max!" Jack Lemmon as Professor Fate, The Great Race

    by bartcopfan on Fri Sep 30, 2011 at 01:51:10 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  As I said (0+ / 0-)

      you don't really understand anything at all about Hayek, do you. Sorry I wasted either of our time.

      •  I'm willing to confess my ignorance of Hayek (0+ / 0-)

        if you'll admit Hayek apparently thought Social Security was good enough for him but not for me.

        "Push the button, Max!" Jack Lemmon as Professor Fate, The Great Race

        by bartcopfan on Fri Sep 30, 2011 at 02:19:18 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  What Hayek really said (0+ / 0-)

          Took awhile, but I turned up the page I wanted. The reason why I don't "admit" your thought is because, it's just plain wrong. In short, Hayek is not any sort of Tea Party or Palin fellow traveler, and ignorance makes for bad discourse and bum raps. Here is Mr. Hayek:

          "There is, however, yet another class of common risks with regard to which the need for government has until recently not been generally admitted and where as the result of the dissolution of the ties of the local community, and of the development of a highly mobile open society, an increasing number of people are no longer closely associated with particular groups whose help and support they can count upon in the case of misfortune. The problem here is chiefly the fate of those who for various reasons cannot make their living in the market, such as the sick, the old, the physically or mentally defective, the widows and orphans—that is all people suffering from adverse conditions which may affect anyone and against which most individuals cannot alone make adequate provision but in which a society that has reached a certain level of wealth can afford to provide for all. The assurance of a certain minimum income for everyone, or a sort of floor below which nobody need fall even when he is unable to provide for himself, appears not only to be wholly legitimate protection against a risk common to all, but a necessary part of the Great Society in which the individual no longer has specific claims on the members of the particular small group into which he was born."

          F.A. Hayek, Law, Legislation, and Liberty, vol. 3, pp. 54–55.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site