Skip to main content

View Diary: "Obamacare" goes boom! (283 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Baloney (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    lollydee

    Now you're just being a troll.

    What cave? Wtf?

    I'd hardly call not letting 15-year-old girls buy the morning after pill a "right wing policy."

    This is a bigger issue than you're caring to admit, apparently. You do know that the majority in the House were pro-life even when Pelosi was the Speaker, right? Should I say that again?

    If they took this step, you'd have a revolt in Congress and a gigantic "I told you so!" from the right-wing Christianists.

    This issue obviously has tremendous implications aside from Obamacare - makes me think you're just throwing dirty underwear at the wall because you can't handle people disagreeing with you.

    •  Reversing the FDA decision based on a scientific (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Alice Olson

      study to appease reactionaries yes, that's choosing right wing politics over sound policy. Right wing policies like having private insurance instead of universal coverage or even a public option.

      You don't like the facts, that this administration sells out again and again to appease a right wing that could not care less about the people  generally let alone those who worked to have Obama in office.

      And no, majority of Congress is not anti-choice nor was it when Pelosi was Speaker.  Republicans control the House right now - see an abortion ban bill passed? No? Did you see one when they controlled white house, senate and house 03-06? No. It's not a majority position.

      •  Speaking of facts... (0+ / 0-)

        Note the date:

        By Eric Zimmermann - 11/10/09 10:46 AM ET

        Even with a sizable Democratic majority, the House of Representatives is more pro-life than pro-choice, according to Rep. Loretta Sanchez  (D-Calif.).

        "We have to acknolwledge that the House of Representatives is not a majority pro-choice," she said on "Morning Joe" on Tuesday. "And I've told that to a lot of pro-choice groups. I would count maybe about 150 pro-choice votes. You need 218 to ... pass a bill."

        The House is now, and has been for years, DECIDEDLY pro-life. Even though the majority of Americans are pro-choice, those who are not tend to vote on that issue above all others.

        So why no bill on it? Because pontificating is a win for them and they're not about to take that issue off the table  - at that point, many of the GOP core voting bloc might actually listen to the baby-killer on the other side of the aisle.

        Allowing emergency birth control to kids without a prescription or even parental consent would cause a HUGE election year issue that strongly favors Republicans.

        No thanks. This is not the time.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site