Skip to main content

View Diary: MONTANA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (288 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  OK, we shall watch (0+ / 0-)

    I do think this will be a very interesting case.  Is the calendar full for this term or do you think the SCOTUS will try to resolve this quickly given that this is an election year?

    "let's talk about that"

    by VClib on Mon Jan 02, 2012 at 03:49:13 PM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  I don't follow it that closely anymore (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      VClib

      Ask Adam.

      Democrats must
      Earn the trust
      Of the 99% --
      That's our intent!

      "I love this goddamn country, and we're going to take it back." -- Saul Alinksy OCcupy!

      by Seneca Doane on Tue Jan 03, 2012 at 01:29:29 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  I just did in another diary (0+ / 0-)

        I'll be interested in his view.

        "let's talk about that"

        by VClib on Tue Jan 03, 2012 at 04:10:41 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

      •  From Adam in another diary (0+ / 0-)

                   
                    If they were to hear oral argument, it would not be until next fall.  I wouldn't be surprised to see the plaintiffs seek a stay from the 9th Cir's assigned justice (Kennedy) pretty quickly to avoid there being any restraint on their speech for the 2012 elections.

        Petition for cert filed within 90 days of order. Summary reversal without argument possible for this term.

        "let's talk about that"

        by VClib on Tue Jan 03, 2012 at 04:34:48 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site