Skip to main content

View Diary: More Proof It's Not Just Abortion They're After (196 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  I haven't appealed to God at all, (0+ / 0-)

    Nor have I used the word "Cuz".  Is that supposed to imply something about my level of education?

    In fact, I haven't pointed out any 'evidence', but rather stated a pretty generic belief that life is a more fundamental human right than all others.  

    •  Frankly, you're just bullshitting (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Alexandra Lynch

      And you are leaving 52% of the human race COMPLETELY OUT OF THE EQUATION.

      What you are advocating, stated bluntly and baldly, is that women do not have any right to life between the ages of ~12 and ~55.

      Between those ages she is a potential slave to any hypothetical fertilized blastocyst that may or may not develop. Between those ages, her so-called "right to life" is totally, absolutely contingent on her never ever ever being exposed to sperm under any circumstances whatsoever.

      THIS is what you are saying when you spew that drivel about "right to life".

      Mundus vult decipi, decipiatur

      by TheOtherMaven on Thu Jan 26, 2012 at 01:41:30 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  I don't think you understand what "life" means (0+ / 0-)

        You're talking about a woman's reproductive freedom.

        I'm talking about a child's right to not have their life terminated.

        The two are in conflict in abortion, and in my views, the latter should be held higher.  I respect your position that the former should be held higher.  I'm not bullshitting you.

        •  But it IS bullshit!!!!! (0+ / 0-)

          You ARE effectively saying that WOMEN HAVE NO RIGHTS!!!!!!!

          You ARE effectively advocating slavery for every human being who has the "misfortune" of having XX chromosomes.

          You ARE in exactly the same legal position (wrong and/or insane) of someone who argues that a homeowner has NO right of self-defense against an intruding robber. (There are "rights" in conflict there too, but the rights of the property owner are generally held to supersede the rights of the robber.

          You are arguing a position for which there is NO POSSIBLE RATIONAL BASIS.

          Your position and your monicker are both bullshit. And you're a MAN, aren't you? YOU will never have to worry. YOU don't give a shit about any of your female relatives or any female you may ever form a relationship with (and with THOSE attitudes I doubt you ever will - any self-respecting woman would RUN, not walk, as fast and as far away from you as she could get).

          Or else you're just trolling to see how much shit you can stir up,and if that's the case, you're doing a damn good job. Now crawl back under your bridge.

          Mundus vult decipi, decipiatur

          by TheOtherMaven on Fri Jan 27, 2012 at 08:46:40 AM PST

          [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site