Skip to main content

View Diary: Abbreviated Pundit Round-up: Upside-down Monday (93 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  It's a "reality check" item. (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    tb mare, TrueBlueMajority, glorificus

    In my home it would mean my kid might not get his (reduced fare) lunch ticket.  We certainly wouldn't be able to get the newspaper (what a "luxury!").  It's a week's worth of gas in the car (and we do NOT go many places, due to the price of gas).

    $20.00-30.00 is the co-pay  my old insurance used to have for "reproductive health care medications" by the way.  When we were between insurances, the cost of the pill was more like $40.00-$60.00 out of pocket.  You don't really get a choice in what your health care provider prescribes for you it's not like you can shop around for the "bargain brand" contraceptive.  (Wow.  That sounds risky, doesn't it?)

    For most women I know, the issue of who foots the significant cost for contraception is a tetchy subject.  It's further complicated by the fact that women don't make as much as men, typically.  And they are much more likely to be underemployed to accommodate child rearing, thus making insurance coverage through their partner important.  

    Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. MLK Jr.

    by koosah on Mon Feb 06, 2012 at 07:18:42 AM PST

    [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (143)
  • Community (70)
  • Memorial Day (27)
  • Elections (26)
  • Environment (26)
  • Civil Rights (26)
  • Culture (25)
  • Media (25)
  • Law (24)
  • Science (23)
  • Trans-Pacific Partnership (22)
  • Labor (21)
  • Economy (20)
  • Josh Duggar (20)
  • Rescued (19)
  • Marriage Equality (18)
  • Climate Change (17)
  • Education (17)
  • Republicans (17)
  • Ireland (17)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site