Skip to main content

View Diary: Evolutionary biology explains Santorum's views (38 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  They acknowledge that in the paper (0+ / 0-)

    It's glossed over in the article, but addressing in the paper that the summary was linked to.

    Keep your religion out of my government.

    by catwho on Mon Feb 20, 2012 at 03:05:43 PM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  And what is the conclusion they come to? (0+ / 0-)

      The actions of my own foreskin during coitus seem to completely negate their theory, so what are their conclusions regarding the foreskin and how it covers the coronal ridge?

      Also, you can't just look at penis shape, you need to examine testicle size as well, and based on the testicle sizes of other primates, we are not by any means the most promiscuous.  

    •  and do they acknowledge taht it's an (0+ / 0-)

      untested hypothesis only?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site