Skip to main content

View Diary: Time Magazine's cover girl this week... (371 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  For God's sake. (3.33)
    I am fed up of people constantly attacking Ann Coulter's appearance because they disagree with her ideology. I agree that she is racist, but there's absolutely nothing wrong with her legs. And the only time you notice her Adam's apple is when some random weblogger takes a fuzzy screencap of her in an interview, zooms in on her throat, and draws a big red circle around it. She is an attractive woman. The only thing that's ugly about her is her sick mind.
    •  It is fitting that we attack her (none)
      appearence, since it is on the cover of Time Magazine! It's as big as life (no pun intended) and completely repulsive. The woman's in dire need of a nosh. We have , as yet, not been privy to the content of the article. Her visual image  is all we have at this point (as far as I know). As to her legs, to each his or her own. I think she looks like a gawky 13 year old. My apologies to any gawky 13 year old who may be reading this.

      They want the federal government controlling Social Security like it's some kind of federal program - George W. Bush

      by kitebro on Sun Apr 17, 2005 at 02:18:16 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Whether or not she is attractive (none)
      is subject to point of view. Some people feel she is unattractive, this is their right. Some think she is attractive, like you, and others, which is your right. I, for one, can't find anybody attractive who blathers on the way she does, but had I never heard her before, with no history, I would find her style and looks (stemming from a questionable diet) bothersomingly gawdy and abrasive. And smug.

      we now know a lot of things, most of which, we already knew... (-dash888)

      by Tirge Caps on Sun Apr 17, 2005 at 05:12:27 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site