Skip to main content

View Diary: Pants on Fire much? (14 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  WTF? (0+ / 0-)

    Under the law as a pharmacist, you are to provide the drugs that are proscribed by a doctor. If, as is Washington, the pharmacist has a political shield to hide behind in an objection on moral grounds, they may do so. They cannot lie to a patient and say you can't have it.
    They must expose themselves for what they are by saying the following, I won't deal in this medication as I object to its use. You are free to seek another pharmacist to obtain this drug. The COWARDS hiding behind the leagal shield must at least stick their heads up to state what their position is. They do not want to lose your business on other meds so they lie. They need to be identified and boycotted or patronised as the individual sees fit. That would be truth in advertising and there is no way they could complain about it.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site