Skip to main content

View Diary: Updated: Verified - Woman Denies Walker Fathered Baby - MJS Columnist Daniel Bice (153 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  The Bice response is not the one citing a 2004 (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    gramofsam1, FishOutofWater

    case - rather that is "I can Read CCAP" so I think that wmcoop exchange undercuts "I can Read CCAP" not Bice - whether that is JSOnline's Bice or no.

    Basically, as I see it, you are asserting at the top of your comment text that the poster with handle "Daniel Bice" - because he corrects an irrelevant cite offered by "I can Read CCAP" - is assuredly lying, for placing in better context the irrelevant cite.

    Now, the second part - that it seems unlikely to you that a professional journalist would choose to comment on wmcoop and disclose story research in progress may be close to the truth. Or not.

    We simply don't know.

    Also, this:

    He would also not post the name of another man as the real father and risk a lawsuit in the process.
    is not what poster Bice did. He detailed that the case cite concerned an entirely different pair of litigants - involving another unnamed child of disputed paternity.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site