Skip to main content

View Diary: Bloomberg: 'Obama health law seen valid, scholars expect rejection' (118 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  This is virtually the whole opinion (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ferg
    The question presented in this case is whether the holding of Citizens United applies to the Montana state law. There can be no serious doubt that it does. See U. S. Const., Art. VI, cl. 2. Montana’s arguments in support of the judgment below either were already rejected in Citizens United, or fail to meaningfully distinguish that case.
    The petition for certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Montana is reversed.

    Ultimately, the only thing that matters with respect to preserving choice is who will be nominating the next Supreme Court Justices.

    by Its the Supreme Court Stupid on Mon Jun 25, 2012 at 07:12:25 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site