Skip to main content

View Diary: Chick-Fil-A's brand approval is tanking (201 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  It's a scoring of their (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    CuriousBoston, TexasTom

    gay-friendliness, I think.  Not anything to do with service, quality of food, wait time or the like.

    Someone correct me if I'm wrong but isn't HRC the Human Rights Council? (Ok, Google corrected me, the C is Campaign.)

    •  Oh, I got it confused with the score in (2+ / 0-)

      the diary. Actually, for gay-friendliness, I'd say Yum's 45 is a heck of a lot better than Chick-fil-A's zero; suggests that the latter has a reputation for toxic attitude toward gays (or zero presence in gay-friendly places), while the YUM conglomerate's score is reflective of its large number of outlets nationwide, in both gay-unfriendly and gay-friendly communities. Incidentally, I've heard San Francisco has zoning laws that are quite hostile to chains of any kind, and I believe the kinds of areas that are most gay-friendly are often the metropolitan areas with a higher proportion of non-chain restaurants.

      "All governments lie, but disaster lies in wait for countries whose officials smoke the same hashish they give out." --I.F. Stone

      by Alice in Florida on Sun Jul 29, 2012 at 09:07:41 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site