Skip to main content

View Diary: I will be rooting for Rafalca, Ann Romney's horse, to win gold in London. (98 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  F that dancing horse (13+ / 0-)

    Should I point out that you and I paid for it's oats and stall when Mittens et al took a $77,000 tax deduction on his 2010 taxes for the horse's upkeep as a business expense.

    The dollars that didn't go into the Treasury will have to be replaced by hard working people like the rest of us.

    btw...yes it was a BUSINESS EXPENSE DEDUCTION not a deduction for medical expenses like the meme that the horse serves as a medical treatment for Ann.

    From what I understand Ann doesn't even ride this horse herself...

    Mojo?!?! What mojo?

    by xopher on Sat Jul 28, 2012 at 01:49:22 PM PDT

    •  That's all true, and I feel exactly the same way (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      commonmass, JoanMar, eXtina

      you do about it. It's unfair and the tax code should be corrected so that bullshit like that isn't possible. But this week that horse is representing my country and I want it to do well. And even though I won't ignore how ridiculously unfairly the system is rigged so much so that the Romneys, greedy assholes that they are, can deduct for their horse more than most people make in a year; I'll get back to hating it next week.

      Lo que separa la civilizacion de la anarquia son solo siete comidas.

      by psilocynic on Sat Jul 28, 2012 at 01:57:05 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  xopher - it was never positioned as a medical (9+ / 0-)

      expense. Ann and two friends have a business to buy, train, and sell dressage horses. No MS patient would ride an Olympic class horse for therapy. Just a nit the Romney were not able to take the deduction in 2010, except for $50. It is a passive loss that is held in a passive loss carry forward until the Romney's have passive gains or the IRS determines that the dressage business is a hobby and disallows all the deductions. So far Ralfaca hasn't cost you anything.

      "let's talk about that"

      by VClib on Sat Jul 28, 2012 at 02:06:22 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  You know, I don't mind paying to feed that horse (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      nearly as much as I mind paying for drones and bullets to kill bystanders, including children, overseas.

      I also mind paying for horse feed a lot less than paying for the corporate welfare that enriches parasites like Jamie Dimon and Mitt Romney and much of the U.S. Congress.

      In fact, I don't mind paying for that horse at all.

      It's the ethic-less, greedy, evil scumbags for which I begrudge  paying.

      They are also A LOT more expensive than "the horse's upkeep".

      Try harder to keep your eye on the real fucking issue.

      This is, of course, the difference between republicans and human beings. - Captain Frogbert

      by glorificus on Sat Jul 28, 2012 at 03:51:03 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  another kossack pointed out the deduction was (0+ / 0-)

      disallowed.  he got $50.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site