Skip to main content

View Diary: Republican voodoo vaginomics bears little resemblance to science on rape and pregnancy (115 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Care to answer the question? (0+ / 0-)

    What do you mean by forcible versus other types? What is the distinction?

    Also, what did you find out in the article?

    •  If you don't know what "forcible rape" is you (0+ / 0-)

      should probably find out before going out on any dates.

      The FBI's definition for UCRs (which I think we can take as definitive for most US applications) is here:

      The article does not seem to distinguish between forcible and other rapes.

      •  No need. (0+ / 0-)

        But maybe you looked it up before going on dates? Not sure why you'd need to say that otherwise and it reflects poorly on your character.

        Read the article again. It talks about rapes that are included in the FBI definition. It's enough to answer your questions. Rapes lead to pregnancies at high enough rates that Aiken is an idiot, but they may be even higher due to under reporting, making these estimates likely underestimates, which is what I was saying before.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (131)
  • Community (65)
  • Media (32)
  • Elections (32)
  • Trans-Pacific Partnership (31)
  • 2016 (29)
  • Law (28)
  • Environment (28)
  • Civil Rights (26)
  • Culture (25)
  • Barack Obama (24)
  • Hillary Clinton (23)
  • Republicans (22)
  • Science (21)
  • Climate Change (21)
  • Labor (20)
  • Economy (19)
  • Josh Duggar (18)
  • Jeb Bush (18)
  • Marriage Equality (17)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site