Skip to main content

View Diary: David Brooks shivs Romney. GOP Brand still sucks. (16 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  The reason why Reagan (4+ / 0-)

    Who else do Republican's have to talk about?

    Bush II - They'd rather stick a rusty needle in their eye and then apply for public assistance. Bush II is toxic and will KILL YOU FUCKING DEAD COLD in large doses.

    Bush I - They won't talk about his because that will just remind everybody of Bush II. Plus Bush I wasn't really a "conservative", was a single term "loser" and ushered in the Clinton presidency.

    Ford - Another singe term "loser" who wasn't a very good "conservative" and you can't talk about Ford without talking about...

    Nixon - Yhea, right, let's talk about Nixon. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAH

    Eisenhower - Who? When? Oh, yhea, right, that guy who was President back in the 50s and who would have been elected as a Democrat had he been willing to run as one. Yes, let's all sing the praises of the greatest RINO of all time.

    Hoover - And I think we can end this retrospective of past Republican presidents with this all time loser, the last "businessman" to totally fuck up our economy. The less said the better as far as Republican's are concerned. I think they'd all like to forget about the most memorable example of why their economic principles just don't work.

    So there you have it. Reagan is the ONLY Republican President in the past 70+ years that they can/will talk about, so they create their myths of the Reagan-that-never-was.

    Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct before reason can act upon them - Thomas Jefferson 30 July, 1816

    by Roiling Snake Ball on Tue Sep 18, 2012 at 05:45:45 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site