Skip to main content

View Diary: Obama campaign calls on Romney to release full 20 years, not just summary (122 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  so, seven years of records (0+ / 0-)

    from when he started running for president in 2007, would take us back to 2000.

    I just genetically engineer them, I don't nominate them for President.

    by happymisanthropy on Fri Sep 21, 2012 at 02:50:57 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  Seven years from present is pretty standard (0+ / 0-)

      for record retention.

      I think attorneys here in Illinois may be required to keep  case records for ten years.

      LG: You know what? You got spunk. MR: Well, Yes... LG: I hate spunk!

      by dinotrac on Fri Sep 21, 2012 at 07:14:57 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  But, so what? (0+ / 0-)

        why is the legal retention requirement relevant here?  His failure to disclose when he should have is not my problem, and I don't need to make excuses for it.

        I just genetically engineer them, I don't nominate them for President.

        by happymisanthropy on Fri Sep 21, 2012 at 09:09:04 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  You can't disclose what you don't have. (0+ / 0-)

          But that would be too logical, wouldn't it?
          Not the Democratic way.

          OOC, how many years has the current President disclosed?
          Harry Reid?

          LG: You know what? You got spunk. MR: Well, Yes... LG: I hate spunk!

          by dinotrac on Sat Sep 22, 2012 at 04:53:04 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site