Skip to main content

View Diary: Federal judge smacks down challenge to Obama administration's birth control insurance coverage rule (92 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  oh swell! now you gave 'em an argument to cut pay (0+ / 0-)
    plaintiffs can hardly claim they refuse to provide a benefit to their employees that those employees could later use to purchase birth control, because they are already providing those employees with a benefit they can use to purchase birth control—money.
    "I can't pay more than a bare subsistence wage cuz who knows what they'd do with the money?"

    yes, it's snark.  barely

    We kidnap. We torture. It's our policy. Embrace it or end it!

    by Mosquito Pilot on Mon Oct 01, 2012 at 04:28:05 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site