Skip to main content

View Diary: "White Horse Prophecy" and The Revelation of St. John the Divine, Chapter 6 (47 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Also take an HR for CT (0+ / 0-)

    You have been spreading this CT for some time now. I am referring to this:

    His driving killed a 57-year old mother of four. He was wide awake blaming the other driver, first thing the next morning.

    Then in 2006/2007 he invents being knocked into a "three day coma" in that accident for his authorized biography, "The Real Romney." If believed, that gets him off with respect to slandering that other driver, Bishop Jean Vilnet.

    I urge everyone who uprated the tipjar to take a look at these diaries on the same topic by the diarist. This one was HR'd for spreading the same CT:

    If that one was Hide-rated for the same CT, this one should be as well.

    •  Documentation for both diaries is extensive. (4+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      bluedust, blueoasis, cany, Timaeus

      -- We found the other driver from that 1968 automobile accident.
      -- His name is Bishop Jean Vilnet
      -- He was not at fault for the accident
      -- He was certainly not a "drunk priest" as he was driving two ladies home after Mass on a Sunday afternoon
      -- Local residents verified the collision site
      -- Romney drove head on into the oncoming Left Turn lane
      -- The articles have the photos

      The conflict between Romney's authorized biography, Romney's current campaign literature, and the next-day report of his status in Mrs. Anderson's obituary is hardly a matter of "conspiracy theory."

      -- The bio states: "three day coma"
      -- The campaign states: "concussion"
      -- The obituary states: "minor head injury"

      Every day, a new lie from Romney.

      He lied to the guys writing "The Real Romney" with no awareness that what they wrote would be researched.

      2012 is a money game.

      Trying to defend Romney ??? Good luck with that. Don't let Big Bird get you!

    •  Shawn HRing a posting does not in any way (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      bluedust, bontemps2012

      prove it false. If you want to call out a diaryist for stating something you believe untrue, you owe it to all of us to state clearly in response why you believe it to be incorrect. Only HRing proves nothing.

      BTW If you are going to quote LDS general authorities be very careful. Many mormon leaders have been known to be "rather lose with the truth" as they say. For example, many of them have asserted that none of the revelations have ever been changed, but a very cursory review shows this to be false.


      GOP - "Home of the Whopper!"

      by Templar on Fri Oct 05, 2012 at 05:43:55 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site