Skip to main content

View Diary: Paul Ryan shows he hasn't given up on privatizing a chunk of Social Security (75 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  You Have to Believe He'd Allow a Dollar to Be (19+ / 0-)

    withheld from the financial markets to be managed at no profit by the government, to believe he would not privatize the entire thing once he got into position to do it.

    The whole thing's going down if any of it goes.

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Fri Oct 12, 2012 at 10:37:40 AM PDT

    •  And we have to watch this long-term... (19+ / 0-)

      Two very scary, major stock market crashes (2000-2002 and 2008-2009) are in our collective recent memories, and to a large extent the memory of these events represents the primary reason why a large number of people are against privatizing Social Security.  Be honest, this was Joe Biden's most effective argument contra last night.  

      Suppose the stock market goes on a 10-year roll from now (not implausible); the risks would be the same, but would you expect privatization to be so unpopular at that time?  Would privatization have been so unpopular if it had been proposed in 1999?

      But all of this is beside the point.  Risk of loss is a downside to privatizing Social Security, but that's not the fundamental reason why privatizing is a bad idea.  Social Security is NOT like an IRA or 401(k), where you invest while you work and withdraw when you retire, even though this is how it is described popularly (I "paid in" and expect to get "paid back" later).  Rather, Social Security is an inter-generational agreement, in which working-age people pay into the pool to cover current retirees, with the expectation that the next generation of employees will pay for them, et seq.  It is a collectivist plan to provide a basic, minimum guaranteed standard of living to retirees.  These are the features that guarantee the program's solvency in perpetuity (provided the right minor tweaks are made to the inputs to and outputs from the system)---there will ALWAYS be working people to contribute to the system, and benefit recipients have NO EXPECTATION of huge gains, just a reasonable, minimum income stream.  

      But guys like Paul Ryan simply can't wrap their heads around the concept of Social Security.  Collectivism is evil and CAN'T work, despite any evidence to the contrary (e.g., eight decades of the Social Security program).  They hate Social Security simply because it is a collectivist program, regardless whether it works.  Moreover, they can only see Social Security as a financial scheme rather than as a pay-it-forward arrangement---which is why they frequently refer to it, incorrectly, as a Ponzi scheme.  To them, everything with a financial bent has to provide an opportunity for huge, maximized gains, where you balance risk and reward.  It boggles their minds to have a program in place---let alone one voters actually like---into which people pay 6% of their income with no possibility of receiving more than a few thousand dollars a month in retirement...which is the whole point---the current generation pays for the last one, providing them with retirement income at NO RISK.

      •  The first thing they did (13+ / 0-)

        was get  us working schlubs to start investing in the stock market. In other words, get their hands on our savings.

        Next they managed to get their hands on our pensions. They got shot to hell in the past 15 years, if they survived at all. Mosty the idea of a pension has been turned into more money for them to play with (401Ks, etc)

        Now they want to do the same thing with Social Security.

        Yet they somehow resent us, because we feel entitled to housing and food.

        Bastards.

        These capitalists generally act harmoniously and in concert, to fleece the people... -Abraham Lincoln

        by HugoDog on Fri Oct 12, 2012 at 12:53:19 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      •  Ryan can wrap his head around SS well enough (7+ / 0-)

        to tap the funds. He already has collected survivor benefits.

        •  But that doesn't stop him from being willing (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          divineorder, 714day

          to end it in the future.

          Paul Ryan has his. He doesn't care about anyone else.

          Of course he isn't practiced at telling everyone everything they want to hear the way the Republican candidates have been doing lately. McCain and Romney are particularly adept at pandering to everyone.

          The GOP is the party of mammon. They mock what Jesus taught.

          by freelunch on Fri Oct 12, 2012 at 02:27:53 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

      •  Social Security (4+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        2laneIA, barbwires, KenBee, divineorder

        A Social Security benefit is a government-guaranteed fixed annuity with inflation protection. You cannot buy that from any investment firm because it doesn't exist anywhere else.

        Such an annuity makes an ideal complement to mutual funds, stocks, bonds, real estate, and other assets that most working Americans have in their 401k, IRA and personal investment accounts. So why financial guys like Romney and so many other Republicans would be against it, or want to change its nature, is a bizarre mystery to me. Any financial expert worthy of the name would say you are spreading the risk and assuring yourself a floor of guaranteed income. And that's a tough combination to beat.

        The people who allegedly would benefit by investing their SS contributions in other places in pursuit of higher returns really don't need to do this because they already are doing so at work or will be at some point in their lives.  

    •  Dems would win an all out fight to the end... (4+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      greenbell, KenBee, seabos84, divineorder

      ...of a Republican push to death of SS/Med by guillotine.

      Tragically, "we" are more likely to play the cheerleaders than fighting the Democratic push to maiming and disfiguring SS/Med by the knife of bipartisanship.

      The Republicans win by losing.

      Let all Bush tax cuts expire and , bring on the Sequestration cuts to defense.

      by kck on Fri Oct 12, 2012 at 02:00:58 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Ryan's Smoke Screen (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      KenBee

      Since being added to the ticket, Ryan has tried to avoid talking about his personal views and positions on issues, and has repeated the scripted campaign line, "Mitt Romney it the head of the ticket, it is his budget we are runnng on", "it is his policy we are running on", etc. Ryan is running for VP. If anything should happen to Romney, Ryan would become president. Does anyone believe that Ryan would continue Romney's agenda in lieu of his own? What Ryan really believes himself matters.

      The Republican Party has been taken over by the corporatists and christian fundamentalists. The corporatists will force you into poverty, and the christian fundamentalists will force you to live under biblical law; daily gruel and scripture for all.

      by glb3 on Fri Oct 12, 2012 at 02:21:39 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  one cloud: the 760 million stolen from Medicare (0+ / 0-)

        as long as they keep throwing that up we can spend time arguing about that instead of very short time most voters actually spend at this to debunk the SS privatization golden goose.

        This campaign is one  long choreographed Gish Gallop.

        This machine kills Fascists.

        by KenBee on Fri Oct 12, 2012 at 02:31:51 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site