Skip to main content

View Diary: Harpers Magazine cover story: "How to Rig an Election" (68 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Hmm . . maybe you're not who I think you are (0+ / 0-)

    I might be actually mixing you up with another poster named Mark also, who constantly argues for the continued use of computers in elections, and also bashes Mark Crispin Miller, Bev Harris, and others.

    Unless you are that same person but you've changed your position on electronic voting?

    •  Not to confuse you with Mark the Anarchist! (0+ / 0-)

      There's another Mark who shows up on all these threads - or used to - telling everyone NOT to vote at all.

      But that's clearly not you.

    •  umm, huh? (0+ / 0-)

      Another poster named Mark also?

      I do post in other places, and my name is always Mark (although my username varies), but it really does sound as if you are confusing me with someone else.

      I don't expect HCPB to sweep the country -- the trend is the other way -- but it works great for some jurisdictions. I think optical scan with good ballot security and auditing provisions is probably the most practical approach for larger jurisdictions; I'm not militant about it.

      I'm critical of Mark Crispin Miller's work because I don't think it's good work. There's no great mystery about that; it has nothing to do with an e-voting agenda either overt or covert. It doesn't take an e-voting agenda to think that Bush's victory in Ohio was less than miraculous.

      Election protection: there's an app for that!
      Better Know Your Voting System with the Verifier!

      by HudsonValleyMark on Wed Oct 17, 2012 at 04:50:17 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site