Skip to main content

View Diary: CNN Headline: "Is Obama the 'Wrong' Kind of Christian?" UPDATE: Let them know! (157 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Is CNN on the 'wrong' side of the constitution? (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    anastasia p, Nespolo

    ' religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to a public office or trust under the United States.' Article 6 clause 3 US Constitition -

    Why doesn't CNN bring this up or question why this sort of illegal litmus test is being considers in the election? Why do they bring up the subject at all? Or if it's legitmate news (only because of all the coverage of religious issues in politics) why aren't they questioning why the subject is being advanced publicly or privately?

    •  Well (0+ / 0-)

      It is illegal for a religious test to exist for public office.

      It is not illegal to vote for or against someone based solely on their religion (nor should it be, nor would there be any reasonable method to enforce it if it was).

      I would agree that doing so or encouraging someone to do so is against the traditions of pluralism, but I can think of religions that simple membership in them would immediately make me vote against that person without knowing anything else about them (e.g. a Scientologist President cannot be allowed under any cirucumstances regardless of how reasonable they seem).

      (-5.50,-6.67): Left Libertarian
      Leadership doesn't mean taking a straw poll and then just throwing up your hands. -Jyrinx

      by Sparhawk on Sun Oct 21, 2012 at 04:20:23 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site