Skip to main content

View Diary: Retired NSA Analyst Proves GOP Is Stealing Elections (203 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  I don't think this is required (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Quicklund, cwech, nota bene

    Most of their analysis covers Republican primaries -- but they aren't relating their findings to poll anomalies at all.

    They're just shocked, shocked to learn that vote shares can be correlated with precinct size. But why not? Precinct size isn't randomly distributed. It's up to them to support the assumption that a zero correlation should be expected, not up to anyone else to measure -- at the precinct level! -- all the lurking variables that might influence vote shares.

    Besides, their causal account that larger precincts were hacked in order to avoid detection makes somewhere between little and no sense.

    Election protection: there's an app for that! -- and a toll-free hotline: 866-OUR-VOTE
    Better Know Your Voting System with the Verifier!

    by HudsonValleyMark on Fri Oct 26, 2012 at 09:24:44 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  Now this math I understand (0+ / 0-)

      So that's the evidence? R=/= 0 (n AZ) therefore The Machines Are Hacked Nationally.

      This is an interesting find in the data. But that does not prove a conspiracy, it indicates an opportunity for further study to see what dynamics might be at work here. As I am sure the pros are doing,

      •  oh, not just in AZ!! (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Quicklund, cwech
        In 2012, the trends are highly consistent with Romney making these strange vote gains in all 50 states, except Utah, and Puerto Rico. There is no selection bias on our part; it’s pretty much like that everywhere.

        p. 2

        (Bear in mind that what they mean by "vote gains" actually is based on an underlying correlation.)

        I think that's remarkably silly. The whole premise, I thought, was that the hacking was concentrated in large precincts to evade detection. Turns out, not only does the supposed hacking occur across much if not all of the observed range of votes cast, but it occurs in 49 states. It's Brilliant!

        The number of votes cast is confounded with so many other things that it isn't obvious how -- or whether -- to approach this as a research question.

        Election protection: there's an app for that! -- and a toll-free hotline: 866-OUR-VOTE
        Better Know Your Voting System with the Verifier!

        by HudsonValleyMark on Fri Oct 26, 2012 at 12:08:07 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site