Skip to main content

View Diary: A legal artifact of slavery (96 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  "British nobility".... (9+ / 0-)

    ...is a crucial part of this whole equation too. The plantation class really did descend primarily from a British (prevailingly Anglo-Norman, with all the suppression of the Saxons they conquered that that entails) aristocracy steeped in royal blood and pretension, and in the rights, privileges, and entitlements of feudalism. Given the status of serfs in feudal Europe, it's no coincidence that the descendants of feudal lords would be slave owners in America.

    PW

    "No, no, we are not satisfied, and we will not be satisfied until justice rolls down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream." --MLK

    by Progressive Witness on Sat Nov 10, 2012 at 11:22:11 AM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  I think that premise is over simplified (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      MichaelNY

      My family, Highland Scots, Chieftain class learned their lessons the hard way being hunted like animals. They came to this country nearly 30 years before the Revolutionary War. They bought land worked that land and never ever owned slaves. That is not to say all Scottish immigrants felt the same way, clearly they didn't. But I think my point is not every english speaking settler thought slavery was a good thing, or thought they were entitled to anymore than a fresh start.

      The work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives and the dreams shall never die. ~ Edward M. (Ted) Kennedy

      by cherie clark on Sun Nov 11, 2012 at 07:00:11 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site