Skip to main content

View Diary: The colossal failure of National Organization for Marriage (186 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Well, I do think... (2+ / 0-)

    the movement has cleverly managed to co-opt the word "Marriage" and that's been helpful.

    New York marriage equality was "New Yorkers united for marriage," WA was "Washington United for Marriage..."

    It's a subtle rebranding, but at least it's more honest, because a yes vote is a vote to let people marry. A no vote is a vote to deny people the opportunity to marry.

    The opposition really is the anti-marriage crowd.

    Supporter: "Senator, you have the vote of every thinking person!" Adlai Stevenson: "That's not enough, madam, we need a majority!"

    by Scott Wooledge on Sun Nov 11, 2012 at 08:09:31 PM PST

    [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site