Skip to main content

View Diary: Young, gay, and put out on the streets by your family (37 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  You make excellent points (0+ / 0-)

    that the homeless need more than things, and it would be a better place if more people offered a place to live and get one's life together.

    I've been there, homeless until I got into a transitional shelter, where I slept for a year. (Unable to work -> 3 years to get disability = homelessness.) So I ask you not to downplay the appreciation of things, like warm, dry socks; a blanket or coat; a tarp to sleep on or under.

    I saw this image on facebook, and almost all of the responses thought it was hilarious. Not me.

    I posted a comment along the response of "How dare you laugh? Most of you are one crisis away from being homeless yourself. This isn't a joke, it's a commentary on how people don't see the homeless, they look right through them as if they're not really people. What you should be thinking is "There for the graces go I."

    It's not just a zip code, it's an attitude.

    by sboucher on Sun Nov 11, 2012 at 12:59:56 PM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  'Things' are part of the problem (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      The reason I 'downplay' (your choice of words, not mine) things is that our material culture makes us think that tossing a few things at the homeless, like socks or a tarp, are going to solve the problem.  They aren't.  

      The homeless need a place to call home first.  Even if it is a tent in someone's backyard, like LFB's post upthread, it is a place from which they can start to get their life back together.  

      The cities that are called the meanest cities to the homeless have one thing in common -- they deny the homeless any place within the city limits to set down, even temporarily.  It's akin to the signs that some cities would put at the edge of town during the Depression advising the unemployed to keep on moving.  

      The Communists had an interesting way of taking care of the homeless problem.  Everyone had an official place of residence.  Anyone who didn't was a bomzh (Russian acronym for "without official place of residence"), and the social workers were charged with assigning them to a place.  So there really was no homelessness in the Soviet Union.  (But it becomes a completely different discussion if you want to talk about the quality of that housing.)

      As long as housing is a commodity to be distributed by the rules of capitalism, there will be those that are left out.  Capitalism is never about people and their social problems, just about making profits on commodities.  And in that world, gay teenagers just don't have the capital to play the game.  Giving them a few things (dry socks and a tarp) may tide them over until tomorrow, but what they really need is a place.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site