Skip to main content

View Diary: Is Netanyahu Killing Palestinian Children because Palestinians seek upgraded UN status (135 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  HR'd for your fallacious claim (6+ / 2-)

    that children are being deliberately targeted. Your opening "I do not have a lot of time here" and invocation of the Livingstone Formulation also scream "troll."

    I would love to be proven wrong.

    Unapologetic Obama supporter.

    by Red Sox on Thu Nov 15, 2012 at 10:00:37 AM PST

    •  I added an HR also (5+ / 2-)
      Recommended by:
      erush1345, Red Sox, peregrinus, volleyboy1, MBNYC
      Hidden by:
      cc, keepemhonest

      I don't want anyone passing by to think this is what Dkos is all about.  Diary is like swimming in a sewer.

    •  Diary makes no claim (3+ / 0-)

      that children are being deliberately targeted; only that they're being hit.  This is the only portion of the diary authord by the diarist (the rest is Haaretz and Bibi himself)  that mentions children at all:

      Did Bibi mean "They" won't get in his way of "hitting them" with so much "pain" - like the current war he "launched" where yesterday 11month old, 6year old and teenage Palestinian children were getting killed by Bibi's bombs?
      . . . which seems beyond question.

      What also seems beyond question is that when one conducts even "precision-targeted" assassinations, bystanders get killed too.   Some of whom might be children.

      •  Yes, the diary is "just asking questions" (4+ / 0-)

        Fox News-style.

        Unapologetic Obama supporter.

        by Red Sox on Thu Nov 15, 2012 at 10:17:51 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  I must admit (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          splintersawry

          I'm more interested in the answers.

        •  If you HR'd my Diary, why are you still here? (0+ / 0-)

          I find it bizarre that you HR my diary yet stick around to fight with people ... very bizarre

          •  Oh dear (1+ / 1-)
            Recommended by:
            Its the Supreme Court Stupid
            Hidden by:
            cc

            Debating others has nothing to do with the pile of suck you dropped here. Corvo, who I happened to respond to above, despite viewing your screed in a more positive light than I did, is someone generally worth engaging on the subject. So I did.

            Cheers!

            Unapologetic Obama supporter.

            by Red Sox on Thu Nov 15, 2012 at 11:20:52 AM PST

            [ Parent ]

            •  Hey, if you're not going to HR me (0+ / 0-)

              then leave me out of it.

            •  Face it, you failed your own Livingstone Form (4+ / 0-)

              ulation.

              You are intentionally posting on this Diary to start a fight with someone who laid out facts, facts you don't like.

              boo hooooooo

              Hey, maybe John McCain will change your diaper for you?

              •  Apparently (0+ / 0-)

                you decided to comment on the formulation without actually acquainting yourself with it. This seems to be a pattern on your part, which makes your username somewhat goofy given your inability to start with yourself.

                Unapologetic Obama supporter.

                by Red Sox on Thu Nov 15, 2012 at 11:30:57 AM PST

                [ Parent ]

            •  Rules say you can't HR people you start a fight (1+ / 0-)
              Recommended by:
              corvo

              with.

              You started fight with TS then you HR'd one of TR's comments left to leftynyc.  That is against the rules, so I'm HRing you for violating the rules.

              You should follow the advice of dhonig who wrote

              Retaliatory HRs are against the rules remove it.
              •  You haven't the first clue what you're talking (0+ / 0-)

                about. I HR'd the diarist, explained why I did it, and HR'd another of the diarist's comments. A retaliatory HR is when you HR someone for HRing you.

                If you're going to play KosCop, it would behoove you to not be ignorant of the rule you're supposedly enforcing.

                Unapologetic Obama supporter.

                by Red Sox on Thu Nov 15, 2012 at 11:35:23 AM PST

                [ Parent ]

                •  Retaliatory HR's are against the rules (1+ / 0-)
                  Recommended by:
                  corvo

                  remove it.

                  You HR'd a comment that was not directed to you but on a a person you started a fight with.

                  You HR'd this Diary but kept coming back to post comments to continue your fight.

                  Your HR on the comment was in retaliation which are against the rules and you should remove it.

                  •  No, what you're suggesting (0+ / 0-)

                    is that an initial HR precludes any future ones if that HR is explained. That's not what a retaliatory HR is.

                    Try to keep up.

                    Unapologetic Obama supporter.

                    by Red Sox on Thu Nov 15, 2012 at 11:45:45 AM PST

                    [ Parent ]

                    •  No, you started the verbal fight then you HR'd (4+ / 0-)

                      Retaliatory HR's are against the rules - you retaliation and won't remove your HR and that speaks volumes about you.

                      The fact that you started a fight with the Diarist and then kept coming back to fuel your fight with not just the Diarist but other people commenting.

                      Your actions on here say a whole lot about you and what your actions say about you is nothing to be flattered about.

                      I think it's amusing, yet sad,  that some people are full of so much hate they just can't wait to fight in the virtual world.

                      Enjoy your fight.

                    •  Redsox - I really do not care if you HR every (4+ / 0-)

                      single Diary I write and I don't care if you HR every single comment I post.

                      I do agree with keepemhonest

                      I think it's amusing, yet sad,  that some people are full of so much hate they just can't wait to fight in the virtual world.
                      Don't forget to HR my future Diaries and rant and call me names all you want because I really think it's important you show people the type of 'person' you are.

                      My Diary tomorrow is going to be on this same exact topic.  Again, I will be illustrating that Bibi is worried he could be indicted for being a war criminal.  

                      Enjoy your hate.

                      •  OK (0+ / 0-)
                        My Diary tomorrow is going to be on this same exact topic.  Again, I will be illustrating that Bibi is worried he could be indicted for being a war criminal.
                        Do as you like. I'm in no position to stop you, nor do I have a desire to.

                        Unapologetic Obama supporter.

                        by Red Sox on Thu Nov 15, 2012 at 12:09:28 PM PST

                        [ Parent ]

                    •  Read and Learn (1+ / 0-)
                      Recommended by:
                      corvo

                      From Dailykos FAQ:

                      Do not troll rate someone you are actively having a fight with. If you are in a heated argument with someone, you should not be judging whether or not what they say is trollworthy. Leave it to others to decide what behavior is or isn't over the line.
                      And you friend, dhonig had an exchange that went like this
                      I added an HR also (2+ / 2-)
                      I don't want anyone passing by to think this is what Dkos is all about.  Diary is like swimming in a sewer.

                      by leftynyc on Thu Nov 15, 2012 at 10:03:02 AM PST

                      Except - everything I wrote is supported in FACT (0+ / 0-)
                      Facts you don't like

                      BTW: I am HRing YOU for violating DKos Rules.

                      by TeamSarah4Choice on Thu Nov 15, 2012 at 10:07:31 AM PST

                      Retaliatory HRs are against the rules remove it.

                      by dhonig on Thu Nov 15, 2012 at 10:56:43 AM PST

                      Also, you insulted this Diarist over and over again as did your friend leftynyc.

                      From Dailykos FAQ

                      Any and all insults are HRable. Although users are never required to uprate any comment, it is considered a violation of site policy to uprate a comment with an insult in it.
                      So when you uprated leftynyc comments that were insults to the Diarist - you violated the rules

                      When you retaliated and HR'd the Diarist's comment - you violated the rules.

                      When you insulted the Diarist and other posters - you violated the rules.

                      Seems you have trouble with processing information you read.

                      I really pity people who have so much hate built up in them that they start fights in the virtual world.

                      •  It amazes me that (0+ / 0-)

                        after several posts on the subject, you still have no idea what a retaliatory HR is, or that an HR of someone somehow precludes future HRs should you explain the initial HR.

                        Really, your inability to grasp such a simple concept is even more mind-boggling than your flailing with this "hate" business. It is entertaining, however. Please, continue...

                        Unapologetic Obama supporter.

                        by Red Sox on Thu Nov 15, 2012 at 12:21:00 PM PST

                        [ Parent ]

            •  Uprated, because the explanation (1+ / 0-)
              Recommended by:
              Red Sox

              for this HR is that the RedSox engaged in retaliatory HRs, when, as is shown in this thread, the persons making that claim (and HRing) have no clue as to what a retaliatory HR actually is.

              Ultimately, the only thing that matters with respect to preserving choice is who will be nominating the next Supreme Court Justices.

              by Its the Supreme Court Stupid on Fri Nov 16, 2012 at 06:14:27 AM PST

              [ Parent ]

    •  Red I never said "children are Deliberate targets" (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      corvo, keepemhonest, splintersawry

      and ... how in the world would you have any idea how much time it took me to write this Diary?

      Your reason for HRing this Diary is because you think it took me a long time to write it and I wrote, "I don't have a lot of time"

      HA HA HA HA hhhhhhaaaaa.....

      Then you accuse me of being a troll - on what basis am I a troll?

      As I said before, if you don't like this Diary then why are you posting so much here?

    •  Livingstone Formulation shows Redsox is the troll (5+ / 0-)

      If we are to use the Livingtonstone Formulation then Redsox and leftynyc are the trolls.

      This formulation is a defensive response which deploys a counter-accusation that the person raising the issue of antisemitism is doing so in bad faith and dishonestly.
      Firstly the conflation of legitimate criticism of Israel with what are alleged to be demonizing, exclusionary or antisemitic discourses or actions;
      secondly, the presence of the counteraccusation that the raisers of the issue of antisemitism do so with dishonest intent, in order to de-legitimize criticism of Israel.
      Since the Diary lays out facts from Israeli news and includes a Video of Netanyahu talking about his desire to destroy Palestine through such dreadful pain they will buckle
      .. and Since: both Redsox and Leftynyc accuse this Diarist of all kinds of things, including being a liar (never mind facts are provided)

      ... then it seems both Redsox and Leftynyc are trying to "de-legitimize criticism of Israel ... with a dishonest intent."

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site