Skip to main content

View Diary: Petraeus exonerates the White House on Benghazi (UPDATE with FOX NEWS Cover-up!) (215 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  More from Peter King (17+ / 0-)

    Q: Did he say why it was taken out of the talking points that [the attack] was Al Qaeda affiliated?
    KING: He didn’t know.
    Q: He didn’t know? What do you mean he didn’t know?
    KING: They were not involved — it was done, the process was completed and they said, “Ok go with those talking points.” Again it’s interagency — I got the impression that 7, 8, 9 different agencies.
    Q: Did he give you the impression that he was upset it was taken out?
    KING: No.
    Q: You said the CIA said “OK” to the revised report –
    KING: No, well, they said in that, after it goes through the process, they OK’d it to go. Yeah, they said “Okay for it to go.”
    Watch King’s statements here:

    •  Peter King must haz a sad.... (8+ / 0-)

      His previous talking points/false accusations are slowly being destroyed, bit by bit, by the facts.  The reporters are actually pulling it out of him, much to his own chagrin, I'm sure.  

    •  Peter King is a loser (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      SaintC, 4Freedom

      "Rick Perry talks a lot and he's not very bright. And that's a combination I like in Republicans." --- James Carville

      by LaurenMonica on Fri Nov 16, 2012 at 10:39:09 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  coolelegans: here's how to embed the video (0+ / 0-)

      1) Go to the YouTube link for it:
      2) Below the video (to the right of Like), click on Share.
      3) In the drop-down that opens up, click on Embed.
      4) In the drop-down box that opens with code, click inside the box, then touch Ctrl-C to copy that code into your buffer.
      5) Edit your diary (in another window is easiest), and wherever you want the video to appear, click your cursor there, then touch Ctrl-V to paste the code there.
      6) Save your Diary.

      Btw, to me it looks like a total cave-in by King. There was no interference by the White House. There was no 'coverup'. Even his demeanor seems like a wet rooster.

      (Btw, of course Ansar Al-Shariah was involved, who else would launch an assault on the US consulate so soon after the US helped overthrow their 40-year dictator. The questions are how far in advance was it planned? Months? Weeks? Days? Only hours? Was it opportunistic, did they jump on the bandwagon of popular protests over the video? Etc.)

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site