Skip to main content

View Diary: Why Karl Rove (Probably) Didn't Hack the 2004 Election (32 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Here is the problem ... (0+ / 0-)

    At first sight, it reads a little like a solid Diary ...

    but take out all the "Rove may have tried to steal the election" nonsense, and it isn't really a Diary at all.

    The Diary is predicated on the discussion of a Conspiracy Theory, which has been specifically banned.

    I hope that the quality of debate will improve,
    but I fear we will remain Democrats.

    by twigg on Tue Nov 20, 2012 at 03:35:36 PM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  not really (0+ / 0-)

      it goes into great detail (in the second half) about why, while many Democrats were certain the election was stolen, there was plenty of evidence pre-election day that Kerry was probably not going to win.

      The kind of evidence we're pointing at today and laughing at the Republican's angst.

      47 is the new 51!

      by nickrud on Tue Nov 20, 2012 at 04:09:06 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  It's Like You And I Read Totally Different Diaries (0+ / 0-)

      This one is pretty clearly pointing out how out of touch with reality the CT'ers are. In no uncertain terms.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site