Skip to main content

View Diary: Walmart Employees Kill Another Alleged Shoplifter (256 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  I'm sorry that you don't get what (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Bright, Sparhawk

    I am saying. Maybe you don't want to, or maybe you aren't good at math. I'll try again though.

    Say that you own a business, with 9,000 stores and millions of employees, and once in a while one of your employees kills somebody. I think you would realize that while that is sad and that you'd try as hard as you could to avoid it, that it was inevitable. It is only possible to have a 100% safety record if you have zero employees. Have a couple of million, and even if 99.999% of them are not killers, you have a problem.

    Don't you get that with a company that large, that all sorts of shit is going to happen, no matter how careful the company is in their hiring practices?

    •  The point is Walmart isn't trying to avoid it (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      mamamorgaine, JayRaye, mrkvica

      Despite several deaths, several lost lawsuits and being told how to change their policies to avoid further instances, they have not changed their policies in that way.

      Thus, no, I'm not going to cut them any slack on this.

      If the "stuff happens" theory were accurate, we'd see stories in the many thousands per year, because there are millions upon millions of retailers throughout the nation. Most of them do not have the "try to apprehend" policy that Walmart has, and thus we do not hear about thousands of dead customers a year nationwide. Walmart is culpable for knowingly continuing to have a policy that leads to customers being killed by their employees.

    •  Get it (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      through your head.  Statics and math do not matter here.  Someone died for cheap crap.  We do not give the death penalty for cheap crap.  It is a moral issue not a statics problem.

      •  It is indeed a moral issue, for the (0+ / 0-)

        actual killer(s). For the company, it is not a moral issue unless it is in some way their fault this happened. The fact that it periodically happens is not, by itself, a moral issue. It is the direct result of having a very large footprint.

        Walmart is so big you may as well think of it as a small country. If you learned that a few people have been murdered in a country, would you conclude that that country had an unusual problem with murder, or a moral issue amongst its leaders?

        •  It (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          JayRaye, mrkvica

          should be a moral issue for the principals even if it is not a legal issue for them.

          Check your 2nd argument.  The analogy does not fit the matter under discussion.  Wal-Mart is not a country.  Wal-Mart management is responsible for the actions of its workers.  Murders committed at Wal-Marts are matters for the local police.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site