Skip to main content

View Diary: Authoritarians at the Gate (146 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  visceral looniness (5+ / 0-)

    Hi Perseflage - You are right. That is exactly the case. I didn't spend as much time on it as I probably should have, but Altemeyer does spend a considerable amount of time on the leaders. They're a different breed. The high SDOs are almost the exact opposite of the high RWA followers. They are cold, calculating, not at all religious, amoral . . . and willing to do or say whatever it takes to get control. While the RWA follower is all about being a memember of a group and following whatever the leader says, the high SDOs could care less about the group except that he is willing to do whatever it takes to keep the group happy. The high SDO is highly self-centered and stay cool. All they have to do is throw some red meat to the followers every now and then. Think Dick Cheney.

    Now, the Double Highs are different. They are the really scary ones. The high SDO side of them is just as amoral, cold, calculating as the "regular" high SDOs. But they also got a heavy dose of the RWA dogmatism, religiosity, hypocrisy, compartmentalized thinking, etc. These are nasty people. Think Pat Robertson, Tom DeLay . . .

    The real loonies are the followers. But that's what makes them so dangerous. They will completely uncritically follow their established leadership. Which makes them prime pickings for the high SDOs and Double Highs.

    "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -- RFC 1925

    by lartwielder on Sat Dec 01, 2012 at 03:23:32 PM PST

    [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site