Skip to main content

View Diary: Skittish Democrats unsure about filibuster reform (162 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Thanks for the info (0+ / 0-)

    I've heard it argued that it is unconstitutional for one session of congress to impose rules on a subsequent session of congress. If they did then what's to stop a Republican majority congress from undermining the next Congress which might have a Democratic majority by simply imposing crippling rules on it?

    Maybe that's where the term "Constitutional Option" comes from.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site