Skip to main content

View Diary: Susan Rice and the 'judgment' question (66 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  was he "concerned" about John Bolton? (7+ / 0-)

    I'll guess no.

    All things in the sky are pure to those who have no telescopes. – Charles Fort

    by subtropolis on Wed Dec 05, 2012 at 10:19:06 AM PST

    •  Sorry for repeating this (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      KenBee, Tamar

      I should have read your comment before posting, was just too upset that the Bolton supporters have the nerve to criticize Susan Rice for being blunt.

      We can safely abandon the doctrine of the eighties, namely that the rich were not working because they had too little money, the poor because they had too much. JK Galbraith, 1991

      by Urban Owl on Sat Dec 08, 2012 at 07:42:30 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  John Bolton made my head explode (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      YucatanMan, Tamar

      Still does.

      "Good morning, brothers Koch. I see you're doing well. If I had me a shotgun, I'd blow you straight to hell." w/apologies to R. Hunter

      by RUKind on Sat Dec 08, 2012 at 08:37:34 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  big difference between the two. (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Egalitare, Tamar
      was he "concerned" about John Bolton?
      I'll guess no.
      mr. bolton was a bluntly stupid republican, wrong in any and every way. ms. rice is a bluntly right democrat. that, of course, makes all the difference.

      republicans are always "troubled" by "uncertainty", though they can never quite seem to put their finger on what, specifically  it is that "troubles" them. oh, wait, it could be that some of these "troubling" people are unheartlandishly hued, and not-men. no, no, i'm sure that isn't it.

      BTD, you know that "cognitive dissonance" is the current GOP's mental illness of choice. some call it multi-tasking, i call it barking mad. talk amongst yourselves.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site