Skip to main content

View Diary: "They lied to the American people": halting Tar Sands Texas style (73 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Events aren't arguments. (0+ / 0-)

    Suitably located small reactors have considerably lower risk of a Fukushima type event. I think that the risks associated with nuclear are real, but they are local and containable. However, they are dramatic in a way that captures the imagination and invokes an emotional response. In particular, the specter of radiation incites bodily feelings of disgust and contamination. Nevertheless, although far less gutturally motivating the risks associated with climate change include grave human consequences on a massive, global scale. It's the consequentialist point of view that brings me around to the conclusion that adopting more nuclear, despite the risks, is worth offsetting carbon pollution.

    I agree that Obama has been a disappointment. However, I think we have been equally disappointing to ourselves. We need to stop hoping for change to come down from above and start demanding it on the ground. I'm sort of tiring of complaining and hearing complaints about what politicians are or are not doing within a system that allows only for very slow reform processes. What needs to happen is for activists to create the social conditions that force a the issue to the forefront of political consciousness and confrontation. This is why Blockade is the most important social movement of our time. It is our generation's revolution/abolition/suffrage/civil rights movement. In all of those cases we didn't have a politician just do the right thing of their own accord. We had popular movements force the issue. It's time to do that on climate change. We need thousands blockading pipelines. It is what's necessary.

    Passive renunciation is not the whole of wisdom.

    by play jurist on Thu Dec 13, 2012 at 01:58:32 AM PST

    [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site