Skip to main content

View Diary: Gun Buyback in Camden, NJ Yields Huge Trove of Weapons (37 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  None of those firearms will accidentally kill (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    subtropolis, GreenMtnState

    a child, or be used in a murder/suicide. It's a small step.

    Yes, regulating semi-automatics is needed, because most of these guns are not the kind needed for multiple rapid killings.

    •  so you're saying (0+ / 0-)

      that no one who turned guns in at camden took the money to go buy a newer, better gun?

      Please don't dominate the rap, Jack, if you got nothin' new to say - Grateful Dead

      by Cedwyn on Wed Dec 19, 2012 at 10:29:49 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  no, she's not saying (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        LilithGardener

        That's a bullshit response. Is it possible? Yes, it is possible. But we won't know for sure until you go out and prove it. The onus isn't on any random Kossack you challenge.

        All things in the sky are pure to those who have no telescopes. – Charles Fort

        by subtropolis on Wed Dec 19, 2012 at 11:06:13 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  The commentor was merely baiting - (0+ / 0-)

          a cheap ploy of projecting words into someone else's mind/comment.

          The commentor was baiting - that's all. Thank you for addressing them.

          I addressed the issue in my earlier comment down thread. It's a 20 comment thread, Sheesh! If Cedwyn wanted to know what I think he/she already had the answer down below.

          I don't take the bait of the RKBA folks anymore.

          •  it's not baiting at all (0+ / 0-)

            you said this:

            None of those firearms will accidentally kill a child, or be used in a murder/suicide. It's a small step.
            sure, those exact guns won't be, but if the owners use the money to replace the gun (which is very common), what's the functional difference?  none. pointing that out is not baiting.  it's called making a point in a broader discussion.

            totally ignoring a direct question, on the other hand, all but begs people to make inferences from your replies.

            and as for me scrolling through the diary searching for your comments, puhleeze.  i replied to one of your comments; i don't have to read everything you wrote to participate in one subthread.

            Please don't dominate the rap, Jack, if you got nothin' new to say - Grateful Dead

            by Cedwyn on Thu Dec 20, 2012 at 07:59:38 AM PST

            [ Parent ]

            •  Believe it or not (0+ / 0-)

              I'm actually supportive of the right to KEEP and BEAR arms, but I don't find your questions or selective quoting, or your comments on this topic particularly engaging.

              Draw your own inferences.

              And now it's time for a nap.

              Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.......

              Snore........

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site