Skip to main content

View Diary: Obama's Biggest Crime Is "Putting 'It' On The Table"? Really? (458 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Never Said It Was Any More Than My Opinion (7+ / 0-)

    But how does one EVER know when someone's bluffing?

    You can't, you can only look at the results.

    Honestly though, bluff isn't really the most correct label for it.  It was really a negotiation tactic that Obama may or may not have been serious about. He did totally withdraw it after The Tea Party Rebellion yesterday though. So there's that.

    This post is dedicated to myself, without whom, I'd be somebody else. Though I'd still be an asshole. My Music: []

    by Beetwasher on Sat Dec 22, 2012 at 08:40:51 AM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  People aren't willing to rely on unsubstantiated (6+ / 0-)

      mind reading.

      All we can go on is the available circumstantial evidence

      The strangeness here is that we have a bunch of people engaged in fantasy telling those of us looking at the circumstantial evidence to ignore it based on your feeling that you know what's in the president's heart of hearts.

      As I wrote above, if this weer a court of law, where the two parties must demonstrate a prima facie case for their position, your position would lose miserably. You essentially respond to the mountain of evidence bys aying its fantasy and then proceed to tell us a fantasy you thinkw e sshould believe.

      Why does your opinion trump the circumstantial evidence that people like David Mixer have posted here? That's what you need to answer, but seem to refuse to do so.

    •  I'm just asking questions here. (0+ / 0-)

      Do we know that the President isn't bluffing? Can we prove it? I'm just asking questions here.

      A thousand Sharkeys are invading a thousand Shires every day across our country.--James Wells

      by SouthernLiberalinMD on Sat Dec 22, 2012 at 10:47:15 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site