Skip to main content

View Diary: The Thing About Social Security (178 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  A future competent Congress can work... (6+ / 0-)

    ... aligned with SS design, within the frame the SSA has to tweak and accommodate demographic and economic trends.

    Our own resident SS expert, Bruce Webb:

    "Workers will have MORE money in their pockets AND will have paid for a longer retirement at a higher standard of living."   Social Security cuts offered...why?
    According to the 2010 CBO report Options for Social Security the chained CPI will "solve" about one third of the projected shortfall.
        Since a tax raise of forty cents per week per year over the same time would solve the entire projected shortfall, it looks as though the chained CPI is going to save workers about 13 cents per week per year while their wages are going up eight dollars per week per year.
        Of course the chained CPI is going to cost them a thousand dollars a year when they are too old to do anything about it.
        Makes you wonder who the President's financial advisor is.
        The CBO report was from 2010. raising the cap to cover 90% of earnings would put the cap at about 150k, and their benefits would be increased.
        This might be salable to them... if they figured the extra tax was a reasonable price to pay for the extra insurance... I am guessing their SS benefit would go from about 26k to about 35k. I don't think they would be happy with that ratio.
        In any case I would prefer to pay the extra 13 cents per week and keep Social Security "worker paid."
        You don't want welfare. it's ugly.
    Dale Coberly
       Everyone interested in actual SS numbers should read that CBO 2010 report 'Social Security Policy Options' or just refer to special figure 1. CBO scored 30 different policy options taken in isolation and although some would interact if enacted together for the most part you can treat the fixes as a cafeteria plan and mix and match to reach your 0.6 target. For example there is one fix that closes 0.9 of that 0.6 which makes room for proposals that shift benefits to the bottom in a way that still mets out at 0.6. Now in the event I agree with Dale that this particular combination adds up to 'welfare' and moreover that that would be a bad thing. But your views may vary.
        The point being that most obvious changes to SS have already been scored, all you need to do is Google the cited document.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site