Skip to main content

View Diary: Chuck Hagel is a NO, Woman to head DOD Busts Glass Ceiling (89 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Throw every Democratic constituency under the bus (0+ / 0-)

    by appointing Hagel.

    •  How does appointing Hagel (0+ / 0-)

      affect students, the elderly, people using foodstamps, small businesses, labor, etc.?

      47 is the new 51!

      by nickrud on Sat Dec 29, 2012 at 04:45:05 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Rewarding someone who is on the wrong side (0+ / 0-)

        of all of those issues is simply wrong.

        And he won't advocate for educational benefits for servicemen and women, won't advocate for veterans, will throw the soldiers who need foodstamps because of low pay under the bus, and won't advocate for labor unions in defense contractors. This is all judging from his record in the Senate. And of course he won't advocate for women, gays, or religious minorities in the military.

        The man is not good for our people!!!

        •  Hagel (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          whizdom

          has already shown his support for educational benefits for enlisted personnel. He was a co-sponsor of the 9/11 GI Bill and spent years getting it through congress.

          Today's volunteers, Hagel said, deserve "what I got coming back from Vietnam, what Warner got coming back from World War II and what [Rep.] Charlie Rangel [D-N.Y.] got coming back from Korea."

          It'd be hard to find a Republican Senator who'd be more of an advocate for the ranks since he was one himself, never rising above Sergeant.

          What Sec of Defense ever advocated for labor at contractors? That's the job of the Secretary of Labor.

          The Human Rights Campaign has endorsed his support for LGBT servicemen and women. The Log Cabin Republicans are the ones opposing him. The target of the slur he made in 1998 (Ambassador James Hormel) made the following statement:

          Senator Hagel’s apology is significant–I can’t remember a time when a potential presidential nominee apologized for anything. While the timing appears self-serving, the words themselves are unequivocal–they are a clear apology. Since 1998, fourteen years have passed, and public attitudes have shifted–perhaps Senator Hagel has progressed with the times, too. His action affords new stature to the LGBT constituency, whose members still are treated as second class citizens in innumerable ways. Senator Hagel stated in his remarks that he was willing to support open military service and LGBT military families. If that is a commitment to treat LGBT service members and their families like everybody else, I would support his nomination.
          He was one of only 3 Senators who voted with Democrats to begin troop withdrawals from Iraq within 120 days (2007).

          There's an historical case to be made that we should not choose a Republican over a Democrat that has legs in my view, but on actual issues that a Defense Secretary will have influence over he's not a bad objective choice.

          47 is the new 51!

          by nickrud on Sat Dec 29, 2012 at 08:03:35 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site