Skip to main content

View Diary: A New Assault Weapons Ban (73 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  If they can't keep the rate of fire down (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    so be it, and still, if they keep the magazine small enough, and slow its replacement, no problem.

    I don't care if people can shoot 8 bullets in 1 second, then take 59 seconds to replace the magazine, or if people can shoot 8 bullets over 30 seconds and take 30 seconds to replace the magazine. Either way is fine.

    Semi-autos would still be fine, just not ones where the magazine can be replaced in seconds.

    "Empty vessels make the loudest sound, they have the least wit and are the greatest blabbers" Plato

    by Empty Vessel on Sun Dec 30, 2012 at 02:54:17 PM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  For people who use these firearms in defense... (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Otteray Scribe, rockhound

      if your proposed restrictions get them killed, will you volunteer to be personally liable for the outcome?  

      Somehow, I doubt you will.  Nor do I think for an instant that you'll let such a responsibility be placed upon government.

      I also doubt you'll allow such weapons restrictions to be placed first on police and government agents.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site